Squirting Is Officially Peeing!

I heard an expert on that part of the anatomy and he said that the only reservoir of fluid that can produce that much liquid is the bladder. Sounded pretty convincing to me.

I''ve been to the wars, and been squirted on a few times. If you've ever tasted urine, you KNOW what it tastes like. Sharp, biting, bitter, metallic ugh- you know it. The lady I was with dribbled a bit of urine while I was busy with DATY, and that was unmistakably urine, so I shifted up, and focused on her clit and let the urine dribble against my chin without taking it in my mouth. Then, a couple of minutes later she started to sporadically squirt, but these spurts were watery, salty and even slightly sweet. Definitely not like urine at all.

After reading that article, I can understand that squirt is perhaps urine that is processed 'fresh' and under haste, so maybe that is why it doesn't taste like 'regular' urine.

I would be curious to know if the concentration of the women's urine in the study had the same concentration of uric acid as the squirt ejaculate.

I have had particular lady at Madam Coco's in hon atsugi that gave a sweet taste of liquid several times in one session. Her name is Kaori.

Funny that one of my mother's best friends, an ob gyn, has told me this since high school.

Not a fan of golden shower (tried give/receive) but love to get a girl to squirt. It gives me satisfaction but something to be done in a hotel bed and not your own Have been squirted on, got in my eye once and had blurry vision in that eye for a few days. Still this article will not put me off.

I disagree, because I've met many female squirters and also in the context of swinger parties and clubs. Urine and the female ejaculate from squirting isn't the same. I think the issue is that fluid is coming from the bladder, so egg heads are classifying it as urine. However, if you smell and taste it, it's DIFFERENT.

1) Urine has a distinct smell, where the fluid ejaculated when squirting does NOT.

2) The consistency of urine is closer to water, where female ejaculate has more of a slimy or oily consistency. Like "watery oil" or the watery version of her normal vaginal lubrication.

3) Urine has a yellowish color, where female ejaculate from squirting is CLEAR in color.

It's a matter of really seeing, smelling, and tasting a female squirter to know the difference. The chemical composition might only seem slightly different when feed to a machine in the lab, but in real life, there is a major difference that can be experienced and understood by a human being.

Note- I've also noticed that there are some women and a particular segment of feminists that are very anti-squirt and others that are very anti G-spot. Like the capacity of some women to squirt during orgasm, or have orgasms from their G-spot bothers them, particularly since they can't. And the feminist element seems to fund studies or attempt to manipulate scientific data to support their weird agenda.

Solong said:

I disagree, because I've met many female squirters and also in the context of swinger parties and clubs. Urine and the female ejaculate from squirting isn't the same. I think the issue is that fluid is coming from the bladder, so egg heads are classifying it as urine. However, if you smell and taste it, it's DIFFERENT.

Click to expand...

I don't know how you define urine, but a liquid containing urea, creatinine, and uric acid coming from the bladder and expelled via the urethra is a pretty good start.

2) The consistency of urine is closer to water, where female ejaculate has more of a slimy or oily consistency. Like "watery oil" or the watery version of her normal vaginal lubrication.

Click to expand...

You didn't even make it to the second paragraph of that article. The "egg heads" explained it.

3) Urine has a yellowish color, where female ejaculate from squirting is CLEAR in color.

Click to expand...

The color comes from urobilin, it's only one of the metabolism pathways of heme, and it's concentration in urine is highly variable and is often completely absent.

But yeah, some swinger using bullet points, capitalised words and underling is more convincing than "egg heads" with all their scans, chemical analysis and big fancy words.

@psd

You are missing the point. My argument wasn't disputing the technical definition. Call it urine all you like.

However, if I put a cup of ordinary urine out and a cup of fluid woman squirt/female ejaculate, there would be a clear visual, smell, and taste difference.

And anybody that has experienced playing with both, wouldn't be confused or think they are the same. Sometimes slight differences, are major.

Solong said:

However, if I put a cup of ordinary urine out and a cup of fluid woman squirt/female ejaculate, there would be a clear visual, smell, and taste difference.

And anybody that has experienced playing with both, wouldn't be confused or think they are the same. Sometimes slight differences, are major.

Click to expand...

If you had read the article you would know. I'm not going to spell it out for you, instead of blessing us with your opinion read the article(s) and you will learn something.

psd said:

If you had read the article you would know. I'm not going to spell it out for you, instead of blessing us with your opinion read the article(s) and you will learn something.

Click to expand...

I've very much read the article, however you are not understanding the broader context and point.

Quote- "Squirting, they found, is essentially the involuntary emission of urine during sexual activity..."

Defining female sexual squirting in this way gives the impression that a woman is urinating on people. And as the title of this thread, peeing.

As myself, and a couple of others here understand, ordinary urine isn't the same as what is squirted. The arguably slight chemical differences, makes for a major difference in smell, taste, and feel. Calling it "urine" might not be the best way to describe it, and clearly there IS a slight chemical difference. A difference, a person can clearly tell, versus them being identical. Furthermore, not all scientists will agree with everything published.

And look at the reader comments at the bottom of the article. Many dispute defining both types of fluid as if the same.

Its more an issue of semantics than anything else. For the man who isn't afraid to get himself a little dirty in the pursuit of pleasuring his woman, it doesn't really matter what the fluid is called, and what the fluid is, as long as there is intense pleasure at the other end. But for women who hold back on their pleasure to suppress 'urinating' on her partner, there is much to be gained in thinking that it is "some other ejaculate other than 'urine'"

I can accept the scientific definition but psychologically, I actually think there is more harm to officially brand it as urine. It just puts another layer of shame that some women might feel when enjoying themselves too much during sex.

Solong said:

I've very much read the article, however you are not understanding the broader context and point.

Quote- "Squirting, they found, is essentially the involuntary emission of urine during sexual activity..."

Defining female sexual squirting in this way gives the impression that a woman is urinating on people. And as the title of this thread, peeing.

As myself, and a couple of others here understand, ordinary urine isn't the same as what is squirted. The arguably slight chemical differences, makes for a major difference in smell, taste, and feel. Calling it "urine" might not be the best way to describe it, and clearly there IS a slight chemical difference. A difference, a person can clearly tell, versus them being identical. Furthermore, not all scientists will agree with everything published.

And look at the reader comments at the bottom of the article. Many dispute defining both types of fluid as if the same.

Click to expand...

"These included urea, uric acid, creatinine (a byproduct of muscle metabolism), and prostatic-specific antigen (PSA). The latter is a protein that’s produced in men’s prostate glands and in the “female prostate” called the Skene glands; PSA is found in “true” female ejaculate."

It's pee and cum, got it?

Read the New Scientist article.

k1234k said:

Its more an issue of semantics than anything else. For the man who isn't afraid to get himself a little dirty in the pursuit of pleasuring his woman, it doesn't really matter what the fluid is called, and what the fluid is, as long as there is intense pleasure at the other end. But for women who hold back on their pleasure to suppress 'urinating' on her partner, there is much to be gained in thinking that it is "some other ejaculate other than 'urine'"

I can accept the scientific definition but psychologically, I actually think there is more harm to officially brand it as urine. It just puts another layer of shame that some women might feel when enjoying themselves too much during sex.

Click to expand...

You get it [emoji106]

And for others, do the: visual, smell, and taste test. Make up your own mind, if you are lucky enough to meet a squirter.

Solong said:

You get it [emoji106]

Click to expand...

You were not making a semantic argument, you were making an identity argument (with several logical fallacies) and k1234k was disagreeing with you.

psd said:

You were not making a semantic argument, you were making an identity argument (with several logical fallacies) and k1234k was disagreeing with you.

Click to expand...

You are doing a strawman (misrepresenting the position of the other person). So, to clarify...

Solong said:

@psd

You are missing the point. My argument wasn't disputing the technical definition. Call it urine all you like.

Click to expand...

Very clearly, the statement I made is I'm not arguing against the technical definition of urine. There is no need to revisit that in which I'm not arguing against.

K1234k, made the argument on this position, better than I did. Therefore, I'm agreeing with him. And I sense he understood in the context of which I was arguing from, and thus formed the better argument. Semantics, shaming of women, and branding it as urine.

But as for the so-called "identity" argument, that "squirt" and ordinary urine aren't the same or you can say the 2 different types of "urine" aren't the same is based on my personal experience. I'm entitled to my opinion, and just accept that it's different from yours.

Ordinary urine, and even with female cum added, would still arguably often be yellow in color AND/OR have that repugnant or distinct taste and odor. I've played golden showers with girlfriends in the shower, to include after sex and they have cummed. Ordinary urine, mixed with cum, still had that distinct color, taste, and odor. I've never encountered a situation where I couldn't tell the difference either.

k1234k said:

After reading that article, I can understand that squirt is perhaps urine that is processed 'fresh' and under haste, so maybe that is why it doesn't taste like 'regular' urine.

Click to expand...

I agree with this. Perhaps there is something about the speed of production or the way the female body is producing it... so that this different type of "urine" is exceedingly more watery than normal and devoid of many of the characteristics it's usually known for. My personal argument was that female "squirt" doesn't have the same characteristics, as identifiable by a human, as ordinary urine. Even if you define "squirt" as urine (oh look, semantics poping up). The one study doesn't invalidate my opinion, nor the numerous other men and women that agree with my position. The conclusions drawn from this one study is by no means all conclusive and indisputable fact for all of the scientific community. Additional information or other studies may yet come out in the future.

Happened to me only 2 times. The first time, I was really surprised. Quite a weird experience; maybe some guys are turned on by that, but I found the wet bed really annoying. (Would have preferred it had happend on the bathroom rubber mat.)

Really enjoying this! Having been 'squirted' myself at my Femdom adventure, if it is as intensely pleasurable for women as it was for me, best let your gals rip, boys, and take an umbrella.

But on this subject - just to throw asparagus into the works - wouldn't the colour, aroma, taste issues depend on what the lady had for lunch?