IND Evening with Simona

[tylermitchell]

Service and/or Provider's Name:
Simona

Date of Encounter:
March 2018

Contact Method:
Email

Appointment Length & Costs:
1 hour social time 200 usd & 2 hour meeting

Type/Location:
Shinjuku & Regular Hotel

Language Notes:
English

Details of the Encounter:
I was hesitant to contact Simona (goes by Simonka here on the forums) as she didn't have any reviews. I'm very glad I did as she is an absolutely wonderful person.

She was exceptionally easy to communicate with ahead of time and was flexible to my schedule. I booked an hour of social time just to check things out as I was unsure given no reviews but my concerns melted away very quickly.

We met in Shinjuku and went out for dinner and afterwards planned to find a love hotel in Shinjuku. That didn't work out (my fault, not hers) so we took a taxi back to my hotel.

I don't want to share details but she is an absolute stunner and left nothing to be desired. I don't have a list of requests and am easygoing but I expect she will be happy to cater to your needs if you share them up front. She is a real lady and I don't think she is the right pick if you are looking for a quick throw.

It was a real treat to share Tokyo with a beautiful and confident European woman. My only hesitation in writing this review is I'd like to keep her to myself for my visits to Tokyo. She is worth meeting!

Final Thoughts:
Recommended, Will Repeat.

Closing Comments:
Can't wait to come back to Tokyo.

 

[Simonka]

Thank you so much for the kind review. I've very much enjoyed both of our dates and looking forward for you to come back to Tokyo! I remember I was still a little nervous on that day before we met as it was my second week as an escort But I believe we have mentally clicked and had physical chemistry to add on top of that, as a result had a truly spectacular time. It was very much fun to have a little walk around the kabukicho with no plans in mind and I remember thinking loudly: "Waow! It's weird to think all these buildings are full of people making love right now." Then we both cracked up.

..and once more I'd like to apologize because you had to swap beds in your room after what happened

 

[Majora]

"Waow! It's weird to think all these buildings are full of people making love right now." Then we both cracked up.

I wouldn’t call it “making love” though!

OP, thanks for the review.

 

[dewdirty]

Service and/or Provider's Name:
Simona

Date of Encounter:
March 2018

Contact Method:
Email

Appointment Length & Costs:
1 hour social time 200 usd & 2 hour meeting

Type/Location:
Shinjuku & Regular Hotel

Language Notes:
English

Details of the Encounter:
I was hesitant to contact Simona (goes by Simonka here on the forums) as she didn't have any reviews. I'm very glad I did as she is an absolutely wonderful person.

She was exceptionally easy to communicate with ahead of time and was flexible to my schedule. I booked an hour of social time just to check things out as I was unsure given no reviews but my concerns melted away very quickly.

We met in Shinjuku and went out for dinner and afterwards planned to find a love hotel in Shinjuku. That didn't work out (my fault, not hers) so we took a taxi back to my hotel.

I don't want to share details but she is an absolute stunner and left nothing to be desired. I don't have a list of requests and am easygoing but I expect she will be happy to cater to your needs if you share them up front. She is a real lady and I don't think she is the right pick if you are looking for a quick throw.

It was a real treat to share Tokyo with a beautiful and confident European woman. My only hesitation in writing this review is I'd like to keep her to myself for my visits to Tokyo. She is worth meeting!

Final Thoughts:
Recommended, Will Repeat.

Closing Comments:
Can't wait to come back to Tokyo.

You are on here to tell details. If you didn't wanna share don't post anything man. Keep that in mind were ALL here to get the scoop.

 

[User#6517]

You are on here to tell details. If you didn't wanna share don't post anything man. Keep that in mind were ALL here to get the scoop.

I thought reviews were to see if a provider was legit or not, resembled her photos, had a nice/bad attitude, etc.. not to share explicit sexual details.

Some reviewers don’t like sharing details because they think it’s too much of an intimate experience, but they still want to help the provider get more credibility.

There is always porn, erotica, and other stuff if you wanted something to masturbate to for free.

 

[TAG Manager]

You are on here to tell details. If you didn't wanna share don't post anything man. Keep that in mind were ALL here to get the scoop.

I thought reviews were to see if a provider was legit or not, resembled her photos, had a nice/bad attitude, etc.. not to share explicit sexual details.

Some reviewers don’t like sharing details because they think it’s too much of an intimate experience, but they still want to help the provider get more credibility.

There is always porn, erotica, and other stuff if you wanted something to masturbate to for free.

To be fair... this review barely made it, there really needs to some basic details of the actual encounter. The review form clearly states that this is part of the process. A review just saying a provider is legit, isn't really enough in the bigger picture. We really expect some details, but not necessarily overly explicit.

 

[User#6517]

To be fair... this review barely made it, there really needs to some basic details of the actual encounter. The review form clearly states that this is part of the process. A review just saying a provider is legit, isn't really enough in the bigger picture. We really expect some details, but not necessarily overly explicit.

I understand that.. although I think there’s a better (more polite) way to ask for more details than the comment above.

 

[TAG Manager]

although I think there’s a better (more polite) way to ask for more details than the comment above.

You are more than correct with this statement.

 

[dewdirty]

I thought reviews were to see if a provider was legit or not, resembled her photos, had a nice/bad attitude, etc.. not to share explicit sexual details.

Some reviewers don’t like sharing details because they think it’s too much of an intimate experience, but they still want to help the provider get more credibility.

There is always porn, erotica, and other stuff if you wanted something to masturbate to for free.

I didn't say explicit details. Just something that would make others look into. And about masturbating I'll just get you... I'll leave it at that.

 

[jhingy567]

this appears to be the first public review of Simonka on TAG. So that in itself is useful imo.
also, it's hard to know what exactly is the minimum level of detail required in reviews. The form doesn't really specify and there is already a precedent, with reviews containing fewer details than this getting published...

 

[Durg50]

I thought reviews were to see if a provider was legit or not, resembled her photos, had a nice/bad attitude, etc.. not to share explicit sexual details.

Some reviewers don’t like sharing details because they think it’s too much of an intimate experience, but they still want to help the provider get more credibility.

There is always porn, erotica, and other stuff if you wanted something to masturbate to for free.

I don't think 'explicit sexual details are needed' But some details to flesh out the story and make it seem more legitimate. This is a really positive but vague review from someone with little or no posting history, on a new provider that nobody else has reviewed. Im really suspicious of any reviews that basically say 'she was great, don't wanna share details, also book longer sessions and be nice' which is what this review says.

 

[Simonka]

Yay! My first public debate over one of my reviews. Thank you so much everyone

 

[TAG Manager]

this appears to be the first public review of Simonka on TAG. So that in itself is useful imo.
also, it's hard to know what exactly is the minimum level of detail required in reviews. The form doesn't really specify and there is already a precedent, with reviews containing fewer details than this getting published...

The review form gives details and samples... we reject those reviews without enough... which is quite a lot actually.
(New rules coming April 1 anyway.... so it will be stupidly clear.)

 

[Frenchy]

The review form gives details and samples... we reject those reviews without enough... which is quite a lot actually.
(New rules coming April 1 anyway.... so it will be stupidly clear.)

Hmmmm... a new rule on April Fool’s day?
Let me guess... the member who posted should send a pic of himself nude with the provider, with a newspaper of the day hiding hid dick (or pussy coz hey a female member could also review a male provider, I’m not sexist! )