This guy royally sucks. I'm not saying he doesn't. I'm not defending him one bit. I'm saying that it shouldn't be a " cause célèbre," and that men, particularly the more " nerdy" gaijin in Japan, should be wary of the kind of chivalry stirred up by this kind if thing-and exploited by bitter feminists like this racist heffer. IRL I'm respectful to about everyone. I certainly don't advocate being this kind of a super pushy asshole. I will only go off on someone if they start it up.
But beta game-being that "nice-guy" who would take something like this and feign very self-serving outrage, that's not going to help the guys in question. Julien blanc is an asshole sure, but most chivalrous guys on the warpath are getting equally chopped up by both men and women in my experience. Just a good time to reflect on what that kind of "saving" gets these guys.
I was a natural in high school. Id always tease and push things a little bit. I'd never do anything like what that douche does because it's assholish and way counterproductive. But at the same time I still had to deal with the nerdy " why is she with an asshole like him? I would treat her so much better!" Laments from these girls' beta orbiters. Some of these girls humiliated these guys in such a way that it made sex less fun with them even though I was seventeen years old ! White knighting is a HUGE cultural problem. It plays a role in everything from foreign policy to military culture to obamacare to gamergate. It's why this guy, roost, Matt Forney, et al have received documented death threats which are ignored in favor of the fake Sarkeesian death threats. Of course it ultimately gets these white knights nowhere. They end up losing out while more conscious men clean up. If these guys would just understand that they have the power within themselves to succeed and that they should value themselves more, they'd understand that the beta make feminist strategy leads them nowhere. A good article on the issue:
http://takimag.com/article/feminism...among_beta_males_jim_goad/print#axzz3JV82suV4
I felt sorry for these kind of guys and still do. I have no hostility towards them. I try to help them, to get them to see how they are being played. Kind of like how Solong does. But less eloquently. But only a few have ever listened. I have no desire to force anyone or gain anything, just to be a helpful comrade to those who are receptive to my message of social mindfulness and self-defense. Those who have listened improved their love lives. But most just continue to fear reality and enjoy no affection, and at least not on the level they deserve. Im not lying: before I got off of Facebook I was actually chatting up Nozomi Sasaki. I know no one os going to believe that- that's fine. I actually called her. But you know-you csnt white knight a girl like that. She's been hailed as an angelic being since her birth ( send why not? She's fine as hell) and " nice guy" just doesn't work. But I'm telling these guys that they are good enough to chat up a girl like that too. Same with Kitty- these women are not "above" anyone, even if they're absolute beauties like kitty and nozomi, anymore than those of us with financial resources are " above" anyone else. Yes all women worth a damn want something in return, whether money, social proof, etc. but outside of one time encounters or p4p what works best is only investing in those who invest in you.
I feel like many, particularly Caucasian guys ( not being racist-im half Caucasian) have a knee jerk reaction to " save" fair maidens. And they get royally screwed for it. I mean in every which way. And Caucasian guys seem to do this with double intensity for japanese women, as they have swallowed the myth that these women are these helpless angels. Then ten years down the road they are on TAG talking about how frigid and mercenary their wives are. And screwed by the courts, unable to see their children.
I just think guys getting out of whack about this dude is not worth it. In fact it's a sign of how easily they can be manipulated into various causes, etc.
Plus the pinkshirt lies regarding gamergate ( such as saarkeesian and quinn's fake death threats) illustrate how their false flag operations can easily affect the corruption of culture. Same with this girl's anti-white genocide dreams. And. She's not alone. Asian women in the anglosphere tend to divide up, like most women, on whether or not they can land a decent mate. Those who can't bitch about "exoticism" and "dragon lady" this and that, because of their sense of inadequacy and resentment at white men. I'm seeing that with this girl's tweets big time. I personally think that if anyone should have a visa revoked, it's a cultural Marxist. Most women (and men) who are not politicos or academics and also not radical feminists don't see how radical third wave really is at heart. For example, at the university I went to in undergrad it's now possible for a male student to be expelled JUST on the say so of a young woman. No evidence required. No due process granted. And this is where white-knighting and not being vigilant about pinkshirts leads-you wake up ten years later and you suddenly have to use gender less pronouns, or are kicked out of your job due to your refusal to deny the obvious biological nature of sex roles. Hell, in Sweden, a law was proposed ( fortunately defeated), in which it would be illegal for Swedish men to pay for sex IN COUNTRIES IN WHICH IT'S LEGAL! Rest assured, you pay for sex in any way and the most powerful, influential pinkshirts will see you as an inveterate enemy. Unfortunately p4p, and because of third wave feminism sex itself, is a " left-right" issue.
You have to be mindful that third-wave feminism originated from Gramsci and the cultural Marxists. It's anti-west, anti-family, anti-liberty. I don't see any aspect of it that can be redeemed. First wave and second wave yes, but not third. Third wave feminism is also referred to as " gender feminism."
Plus the whole " sex object" thing is so easy to manipulate. Almost no men truly treat women like objects. Valuing women for mostly sex isn't " objectifying" if you ask me. Not anymore than valuing my tennis buddy because he's good. We don't have to be close to play tennis and we don't have to be close to have sex.
I think the return of kings article made some good points. Really just wanted to plug that but ended up with more to say. And also, I'm not a PUA. I don't have the time for much pick-up ATM and there's no need in any of those silly techniques in my opinion. I am into the general framework and principles though. What I am is a fairly hardcore rightist, desirous of a healthy society in which good men are less put upon and taken advantage of ( at least that's my style of leadership). And in which biological sex roles are acknowledged and pro-social relations are restored.
But I'm rambling- attack this guy if you want. He's pretty shitty so no complaints from me there. I just want men to be more mindful of where this sentiment can possibly ( but doesn't have to ) lead.
