Oh, no doubt they're going to 25th him. That's been part of their plan. Democrats will help with that cause a crooked Vance is still preferable to Trump. He's just going to campaign again starting the first month. His dementia will also worsen. Oh, and golfing every weekend because of course.
If I was running that op, I'd let him go golfing and drop a patsy's body after the headshot into that orange melon.
Blanket tariffs are probably not in the real play book. He just threatens them so that he can "scale back" the tariffs to target what should be done anyways. Then he looks both strong on trade but also reasonable. Its basically what he did in his last term with china. And china is basically what is important as the country is doing lots of bullshit to impact trade like manipulating currency and heavily subsidizing target markets(mainly renewable energy and electric vehicles). It's important to not let china control those industries through illegal means as they have basically stolen all the tech from other countries and are looking to create market share to ensure global reliance on trade with china.
I don't think so. I expect Vance to sit in the back and let trump do his thing. It will probably go sour by year 3 and then Vance can act like an opposition force who doesn't support what trump is doing. That way he can compaign in 2028 as the new republican nominee who is the new face of MAGA.
Well, you don't really owe your country anything to begin with. It's all just about the specific patch of dirt you were born on. No one decides where they were born. You have no obligation to help or do anything but look out for your own self when times are this bad
I always operated under the premise of "leave things better than they were when you arrived". I know this country is just the patch of dirt I was born on, but it's the patch of dirt I live on, so I thought I could help improve it a bit. Seems like the people here don't want that, so I'm going to narrow my focus a bit, work on improving my immediate surroundings only, and see if leaving is really the best option for me now. I'm fortunate enough that this is an actual realistic option for me.
I mean, yeah! It's always great to help when you can, of course. I just mean, you don't have to feel guilty as long as you're not actively making it worse at least.
Well yes because thats all the majority of their party members are capable of thinking about
Well yeah it was important to give the good fight. Harris wasn't better for America alone- she was better for the world.
hopefully you dont feel like i was throwing shade. I did my best not to make qualifying remarks. Whatever inhumane acts happen in the world, we gotta treat each other like humans. Aint my place to judge, nor should you take what anyone here says seriously. I could be a 13 year old kid from NORTH Korea for all you know.
Yeah, we're gonna follow the Russia/China model of oligarchy for sure, especially with Musk in government.
Not at all, like i said. Its helpful.hopefully you dont feel like i was throwing shade. I did my best not to make qualifying remarks. Whatever inhumane acts happen in the world, we gotta treat each other like humans. Aint my place to judge, nor should you take what anyone here says seriously. I could be a 13 year old kid from NORTH Korea for all you know.
There are a lot of ideas and policies that are good, in theory. But the application can make or break them. For example, requiring an ID to vote doesn't sound too bad, does it? Sounds pretty common sense, right? Ok, but what if you require people to vote using very specific IDs (no student IDs, no native reservation IDs), and then close all the places you can get the required IDs in specific counties and neighborhoods, so that people who live there have to travel hours to the nearest place to get an ID. Not so fair anymore, is it?
I'm honestly for voter ID…
Yea I always said that if they want to make voter ID laws, then they should do national government voter IDs when registering to vote. Gather the proper documents and everyone can receive one. It would cost a lot, but it would be useful in so many other areas of life too. I know many people who can't get a driver's licence and have a hard time in life whenever ID is required.
Yep. I don't think there's any one who actually is against voter ID as a concept. The only issue is that it's easily abused to disenfranchise voters. If ID is free and easy to get and everyone can get one without trouble, then by all means, make it so.
Yep. It's really ironic because the same people who see no issue with voter ID laws when IDs cost money and sometimes significant time, also care a whole lot about every single obstacle placed in their path on the way to buy guns. "Any obstacle between me and my 2nd amendment right is unconstitutional! Now let's add a bunch of obstacles in front of the right to vote..."
