The Next US President is....

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know what you're trying to say and appreciate it. "The unquestioned life is not worth living." However, the number of liberals in the media far out-number conservatives - like a typhoon versus a handful of raindrops. btw, I like Tucker and Lou; and sometimes Laura. Tucker's interview with that loon, Yvette Felarca, was classic.

I enjoy Tucker and even Hannity in small doses, but I'm not a really big fan of Laura Ingraham. I agree with her about 95% of the time but she just seems like a bitch. You know the type...and lots of them in politics...the ones that try really hard to come off as smart, and cynical and smug and condescending...to the point that you agree with them about everything but you wish you didn't? Some friends of mine are upper-level GOP officers and they get invited to all those ritzy White House events (Christmas party, whatever ball, etc.) and they absolutely love hanging out with Ingraham and getting selfies with her. But those friends (and I use that term loosely) are also vapid douchebags.

For me, there's one Fox host that sends a thrill up my leg.

shannon-bream.jpg


I can't be the only one who thinks she's getting hotter as she ages. That's why my Republican lifetime achievement wishlist stands as:

1) Become a billionaire

2) Go drinking with George W. Bush

3) Jizz inside Shannon Bream
 
  • Like
Reactions: DireWolf98
I know what you're trying to say and appreciate it. "The unquestioned life is not worth living." However, the number of liberals in the media far out-number conservatives - like a typhoon versus a handful of raindrops. btw, I like Tucker and Lou; and sometimes Laura. Tucker's interview with that loon, Yvette Felarca, was classic.

I agree on the quantity disadvantage. But for what I saw (its not like Im glued to Fox everyday !) they overcompensate in partisan BS levels and double standards. The level of ass-kissing and blunders’ forgiving (or justifying, or simply forgetting) for Trump is astounding , compared to how they treated Obama...
(not to mention the sexual assaults issues... sounds like a rather toxic work environment overall)



 
Last edited:
I enjoy Tucker and even Hannity in small doses, but I'm not a really big fan of Laura Ingraham. I agree with her about 95% of the time but she just seems like a bitch. You know the type...and lots of them in politics...the ones that try really hard to come off as smart, and cynical and smug and condescending...to the point that you agree with them about everything but you wish you didn't? Some friends of mine are upper-level GOP officers and they get invited to all those ritzy White House events (Christmas party, whatever ball, etc.) and they absolutely love hanging out with Ingraham and getting selfies with her. But those friends (and I use that term loosely) are also vapid douchebags.

For me, there's one Fox host that sends a thrill up my leg.

shannon-bream.jpg


I can't be the only one who thinks she's getting hotter as she ages. That's why my Republican lifetime achievement wishlist stands as:

1) Become a billionaire

2) Go drinking with George W. Bush

3) Jizz inside Shannon Bream

I wonder how many Fox executives tried to jizz inside her too...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DireWolf98
compared to how they treated Obama...
As they should have treated President Obama (aka The Intern In Chief, The Manchurian Candidate). The rest of the media worshipped the ground he walked on and sighed in excitement at every utterance.

Somewhere in my digital files, I'll have to search for it when work calms down, is a 2004 editorial from a trade magazine (either Editor & Publisher or the Columbia Journalism Review) which lamented the overwhelming bias in the U.S. media. The editorial stated that most journalists had become "unpaid adjuncts of the Democratic Party." The situation hasn't improved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keihan
As they should have treated President Obama (aka The Intern In Chief, The Manchurian Candidate). The rest of the media worshipped the ground he walked on and sighed in excitement at every utterance.

Somewhere in my digital files, I'll have to search for it when work calms down, is a 2004 editorial from a trade magazine (either Editor & Publisher or the Columbia Journalism Review) which lamented the overwhelming bias in the U.S. media. The editorial stated that most journalists had become "unpaid adjuncts of the Democratic Party." The situation hasn't improved.

well, lets agree to disagree (or half-agree) on that
Im happy to be born in a country , and live in another one, where TV journalists may have biases (who doesn’t) but are a bit more subtle about them than Fox News, which is mostly a propaganda tool.

I like a media to give me the facts first and foremost, not (mainly) some spin on them

by the way I had to check the definition of Manchurian Candidate... here it is:

« A Manchurian candidate is a person, especially a politician, being used as a puppet by an enemy power. The term is commonly used to indicate disloyalty or corruption, whether intentional or unintentional »

Are you sure it’s not better fitted to the current guy?! o_O
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: just4fun
well, lets agree to disagree (or half-agree) on that
Im happy to be born in a country , and live in another one, where TV journalists may have biases (who doesn’t) but are a bit more subtle about them than Fox News, which is mostly a propaganda tool.

I like a media to give me the facts first and foremost, not (mainly) some spin on them

by the way I had to check the definition of Manchurian Candidate... here it is:

« A Manchurian candidate is a person, especially a politician, being used as a puppet by an enemy power. The term is commonly used to indicate disloyalty or corruption, whether intentional or unintentional »

Are you sure it’s not better fitted to the current guy?! o_O
I don’t know much about the French media circus but I hope French journalists take a more critical look at things than their Japanese colleagues.
 
I don’t know much about the French media circus but I hope French journalists take a more critical look at things than their Japanese colleagues.
Depends. TV is usually more neutral . You will never hear North-Korean style over-the-top kiss-ass praises like Lou Dobbs or Hannity serve to Trump.

However printed press can be very opinionated one way or the other (in Japan too , to some degree... just look at some weeklies, not the main daily newspapers)
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadowboxer
However printed press can be very opinionated one way or the other (in Japan too , to some degree... just look at some weeklies, not the main daily newspapers)

I am all fine with that as long as they openly admit it. What I hate to the end is media that claims to be neutral or even non-political and then goes on with agenda anyway. But I guess that's just me being old fashioned.
 
well, lets agree to disagree (or half-agree) on that
Im happy to be born in a country , and live in another one, where TV journalists may have biases (who doesn’t) but are a bit more subtle about them than Fox News, which is mostly a propaganda tool.
CNN, CBS, NBS, PBS, MSNBC and ABC are non-subtle propaganda tools.

If those outlets subjected Presidents Clinton and Obama to the level of scrutiny and negative coverage that Republicans receive, the general public would have been less in awe of Presidents Clinton and Obama.

When the liberal-dominated media help set the narrative, that migrates to the media outside the U.S.


I hope that you were joking when you included the Trevor Noah "scandal" video.

Somehow, that video failed to include Political Profiling by the IRS; the State Department e-mail situation; and Operation Fast and Furious. Also, for someone who campaigned that he would have the most-transparent administration in history, President Obama ran in the opposite direction.

In general, even the hyper-Democratic-Party-cheerleader-on-steroids, The Washington Post, called BS:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...46caba-21c1-11e6-9e7f-57890b612299_story.html

PBS on FOIA:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/obama-administration-sets-new-record-withholding-foia-requests
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keihan
You will never hear North-Korean style over-the-top kiss-ass praises like Lou Dobbs or Hannity serve to Trump.
I can only assume that you missed such gag-inducing puff-piece worship coverage as "A Day In The Obama White House."

Lou and Sean are raindrops versus a typhoon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keihan and Nixon2
CNN, CBS, NBS, PBS, MSNBC and ABC are non-subtle propaganda tools.

If those outlets subjected Presidents Clinton and Obama to the level of scrutiny and negative coverage that Republicans receive, the general public would have been less in awe of Presidents Clinton and Obama.

When the liberal-dominated media help set the narrative, that migrates to the media outside the U.S.


I hope that you were joking when you included the Trevor Noah "scandal" video.

Somehow, that video failed to include Political Profiling by the IRS; the State Department e-mail situation; and Operation Fast and Furious. Also, for someone who campaigned that he would have the most-transparent administration in history, President Obama ran in the opposite direction.

In general, even the hyper-Democratic-Party-cheerleader-on-steroids, The Washington Post, called BS:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...46caba-21c1-11e6-9e7f-57890b612299_story.html

PBS on FOIA:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/obama-administration-sets-new-record-withholding-foia-requests

you probably make valid points but miss the reason of the videos I post . I didnt imply that Obama is perfect and should not be criticized for mistakes he made . And yes probably the other TV networks were too lenient on him (again, I’m not glued to US TV all the time)

the purpose was to show that Fox deliberately chose to criticize him on « issues » which were :

1. Ridiculously petty (he asked marines to carry umbrellas, wow, big deal... some days he didn’t wear his flag pin: the horror! ... He bowed to the Saudi king : scandal!)

2. For which Trump did exactly the same things (last frames of each segment)

that’s the kind of partisan , mean, double-standard BS « journalism » which is inflaming divisions in your country . And yes , mocking Trump when he walked down that slope was not smart either.
 
well, lets agree to disagree (or half-agree) on that
Im happy to be born in a country , and live in another one, where TV journalists may have biases (who doesn’t) but are a bit more subtle about them than Fox News, which is mostly a propaganda tool.

I like a media to give me the facts first and foremost, not (mainly) some spin on them

by the way I had to check the definition of Manchurian Candidate... here it is:

« A Manchurian candidate is a person, especially a politician, being used as a puppet by an enemy power. The term is commonly used to indicate disloyalty or corruption, whether intentional or unintentional »

Are you sure it’s not better fitted to the current guy?! o_O

Of course you have to be fair and recognize the differences with FOX and other networks. All those pundits you hate like Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs, Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, etc., those are NOT journalists or reporters and don't purport to be, at least in their capacity on FOX. They are conservative political commentators and columnists and are paid (very well, too) to spout right-wing talking points. The actual journalists that FOX has, like Chris Wallace, Bret Baier, Harrison Faulkner, Martha MacCallum and, my favorite, Shannon Bream, are all extremely professional and unbiased reporters. Of course they're all fairly political and from both sides, but they're professional enough to separate that from work.

Contrast that with CNN, which in my opinion has become a fucking joke of a network, and its so-called "journalists" like Anderson Cooper, Chris Cuomo, Jim Acosta and the worst one of them all, Don Lemon, who go masquerading around as "journalists" but are nothing but left-wing activists and mouthpieces for the Democrat Party using their jobs to push an agenda. I mean, just watch that utterly shameless interview with Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo a couple days ago where Lemon is ranting about the electoral college and how "we" have to "blow it all up" when Democrats re-take the Senate, to the point where even Cuomo was trying to shut him down and remind him of how Constitutional Amendments work. Lemon continues ranting that "we" need to "stack the courts," an idea that RBG, herself, said was a horrible idea.

My other beef with CNN is that, not surprisingly, they cherry-pick what news stories they broadcast. Most recently, they flat-out refused to report both Trump's Nobel nomination and then the historic Middle-East peace treaty. I forgot where I saw the screen shot but a CNN reporter outside the Rose Garden during the signing of the treaty actually referred to it as "some sort of large gathering," and the only time the network ever recognized the Nobel nomination was a few days later in a scathing political op-ed ripping on Trump for bragging that he deserved it. And let's not forget all of the "peaceful protests" like the one last night where cops were getting shot. You simply cannot get a genuine news report from CNN anymore.

That's also why I give MSNBC credit, even though I never tune in. They don't even pretend to be journalists or reporters. Every single figure on MSNBC is a proud, loud, far-left radical activist, with unhinged lunatics like Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow and that demented Joe & Mika couple but I give them credit for being honest about what they are. They don't ever report news. They broadcast liberal and leftist outrage.

That's why when people ask me where I turn for news, I tell them: FOX NEWS. I know that they report EVERYTHING. It might be 30 minutes of actual news, followed by 4 hours of talking heads and biased ranting from their political commentators but that's why I watch the daily news broadcasts and then change the channel before the commentary programs begin.

I don't know if things have changed since then, but I remember being in Japan, probably around 2007-ish, sitting at our regular bar with a bunch of British teachers and watching a BBC documentary where a reporter was embedded with a unit of American soldiers or marines in an Afghani combat zone. I remember being astonished by his reporting, which was surprisingly objective and detailed and really focusing on the challenges and sacrifices that a lot of the young guys were facing and how committed they were to getting the job done and going home alive. This, at a time when any "reporting" from any American "reporter" (from CNN) with enough balls to step off the plane in Afghanistan would generally consist of anti-war hysterics, rants about GWB's warmongering for oil and smug gloating whenever news of casualties arrived. I remarked about that to a British drinking buddy and he replied: "Because we actually pride ourselves on telling the truth, unlike your news networks." Probably true.

Whatever the case, FOX remains, by far, the most watched network in America and has been for years.
 
Last edited:
"Because we actually pride ourselves on telling the truth, unlike your news networks." Probably true.

ABSOLUTELY true . You guys don’t really want information, you just want to hear the spin you like.

and your last sentence shows that (sadly) Fox is now the mainstream media

The rest was just your usual « whataboutism » which is so predictable I’ve read it only diagonally .

and now off to more interesting things than arguing about US TV networks
 
Below is excerpt from the left-wing Guardian (UK). I would imagine the silent majority in the US don’t think it is acceptable for yobbish behavior to take place at funerals. Same with the smashing up of businesses during the BLM riots.

When it’s time to vote, the silent majority remember these kinds of incidents and decide if they want to be on the same side as the ‘protesters’.

Today’s Guardian;

Donald Trump was greeted with jeers and boos on Thursday as he visited the late supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s flag-draped coffin in Washington.

The crowd at the bottom of the steps to the famous supreme court building near the US Capitol, gathered to honor the liberal justice as she lies in repose, had a seemingly visceral reaction as the president turned up.

Ginsburg died last Friday at the age of 87.

Trump, wearing a black face mask and accompanied by Melania Trump, stood near the casket at the marble court building amid clearly audible, loud booing from many assembled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nixon2 and Keihan
Below is excerpt from the left-wing Guardian (UK). I would imagine the silent majority in the US don’t think it is acceptable for yobbish behavior to take place at funerals. Same with the smashing up of businesses during the BLM riots.

When it’s time to vote, the silent majority remember these kinds of incidents and decide if they want to be on the same side as the ‘protesters’.

Today’s Guardian;

Donald Trump was greeted with jeers and boos on Thursday as he visited the late supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s flag-draped coffin in Washington.

The crowd at the bottom of the steps to the famous supreme court building near the US Capitol, gathered to honor the liberal justice as she lies in repose, had a seemingly visceral reaction as the president turned up.

Ginsburg died last Friday at the age of 87.

Trump, wearing a black face mask and accompanied by Melania Trump, stood near the casket at the marble court building amid clearly audible, loud booing from many assembled.


That just highlights the difference between both sides, and why public opinion is, predictably, shifting in Trump's favor right now. I disagreed with almost every single position RBG held but I would've been honored to attend her service and pay my respects. Can you even imagine a group of Republicans booing and chanting and screaming obscenities at Justice Scalia's funeral if Barack and Michelle showed up to pay tribute? Or what the media would've spun that into ("RACIST GOP NAZI SCALIA-SUPPORTERS THREATEN OBAMA AT SERVICE!!")?

Of course, we never had to find out because Obama refused to attend Scalia's funeral, classy president that he was.

I'm of the opinion that funeral services are the one time you show absolute respect, no matter what. If my kids ever acted disrespectfully at a funeral service I'd smack the living shit out of them back at the car. That's why I'm a huge fan of those conservative biker/veteran groups that volunteer at funerals of deceased gay service members when those inbred fucking rednecks from the Westborough Baptist Church (the "God Hates Fags" guys) show up. I could never volunteer for that. I'd probably end up getting into a brawl or gunfight. People who disrespect funerals for military fallen should be hanged in the town square.
 
That just highlights the difference between both sides, and why public opinion is, predictably, shifting in Trump's favor right now. I disagreed with almost every single position RBG held but I would've been honored to attend her service and pay my respects. Can you even imagine a group of Republicans booing and chanting and screaming obscenities at Justice Scalia's funeral if Barack and Michelle showed up to pay tribute? Or what the media would've spun that into ("RACIST GOP NAZI SCALIA-SUPPORTERS THREATEN OBAMA AT SERVICE!!")?

Of course, we never had to find out because Obama refused to attend Scalia's funeral, classy president that he was.

I'm of the opinion that funeral services are the one time you show absolute respect, no matter what. If my kids ever acted disrespectfully at a funeral service I'd smack the living shit out of them back at the car. That's why I'm a huge fan of those conservative biker/veteran groups that volunteer at funerals of deceased gay service members when those inbred fucking rednecks from the Westborough Baptist Church (the "God Hates Fags" guys) show up. I could never volunteer for that. I'd probably end up getting into a brawl or gunfight. People who disrespect funerals for military fallen should be hanged in the town square.

from the article you posted as link :

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest revealed the president’s plans during the daily briefing, saying Obama and first lady Michelle Obama will go to the Supreme Court on Friday “to pay their respects to Justice Scalia” while the justice lies in repose in the Great Hall.

so... its exactly what Trump is doing too right?

do you think Trump will attend the funeral in addition?
 
do you think Trump will attend the funeral in addition?

Yes, because unless there's some catastrophic event that prevents it, all Presidents attend the funerals for individuals of that stature. Trump has attended every high-profile funeral since taking office, save for one. He didn't attend John McCain's funeral, because the McCain family personally informed him that he wasn't welcome there.

And from a political standpoint, he will attend because he still needs to appear compassionate and caring. There's a political storm brewing over the SCOTUS appointment and one of the many desperate criticisms that Democrats will hurl is that Trump is "disrespecting" RBG by appointing her replacement--as is required by our Constitution and historical precedent.

And once again, the left will probably show how classy it is by having ugly protests outside the Washington National Cathedral, which is where I'm assuming they'll hold the final funeral service and program.
 
Yes, because unless there's some catastrophic event that prevents it, all Presidents attend the funerals for individuals of that stature. Trump has attended every high-profile funeral since taking office, save for one. He didn't attend John McCain's funeral, because the McCain family personally informed him that he wasn't welcome there.

And from a political standpoint, he will attend because he still needs to appear compassionate and caring. There's a political storm brewing over the SCOTUS appointment and one of the many desperate criticisms that Democrats will hurl is that Trump is "disrespecting" RBG by appointing her replacement--as is required by our Constitution and historical precedent.

And once again, the left will probably show how classy it is by having ugly protests outside the Washington National Cathedral, which is where I'm assuming they'll hold the final funeral service and program.

ok, we’ll see... gotta love the « still needs to appear compassionate and caring » :D

errr... probably stupid question but she’s Jewish, so why a cathedral?
 
Trump has attended every high-profile funeral since taking office, save for one.

and John Lewis’ I suppose (but maybe not « high profile » enough for you. Bush was there though)
 
and John Lewis’ I suppose (but maybe not « high profile » enough for you. Bush was there though)

I should've clarified, "high profile" in D.C. is 1) presidents, 2) Supreme Court Justices or 3) legislative leaders (speaker of the House, Senate President, etc.). Those are the big ones. There are also notable exceptions, like when legendary, long-time figures die (Dan Inouye, for example). Not to say that John Lewis wasn't a notable figure in American history, but he was just a single Congressman who also led the charge to impeach Trump. Further, everyone in the building knew they were going to use the funeral service as a publicity stunt to demand impeachment (which Obama happily did). Were I Trump, I wouldn't have attended, either.
 
I should've clarified, "high profile" in D.C. is 1) presidents, 2) Supreme Court Justices or 3) legislative leaders (speaker of the House, Senate President, etc.). Those are the big ones. Not to say that John Lewis wasn't a notable figure in American history, but he was just a single Congressman who also led the charge to impeach Trump. Further, everyone in the building knew they were going to use the funeral service as a publicity stunt to demand impeachment (which Obama happily did). Were I Trump, I wouldn't have attended, either.

ah ok
Its like the rules about voting or not voting for a SCOTUS appointee
They seem made up and variable each time an objection appears
But thanks for the lesson in US funerals protocols anyway :D

Hey you already found the talking point if after all DJT doesn’t attend RBG’s funeral: its because it would have been a stunt for the Dems, and you wouldn’t have attended either.
 
errr... probably stupid question but she’s Jewish, so why a cathedral?

Though it was built by the Episcopalians, it was always seen as a non-denominational church. Pretty sure there's some label somewhere on it, "house of all people," or something along those lines. Basically, if you're famous in D.C., this is where you want to have your funeral.

Of course, the Ginzberg family could opt to do it elsewhere, or have a small private service or even none at all. If I had it my way, I'd have a funeral like Ronald Reagan's. That one was impressive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DireWolf98
Status
Not open for further replies.