Guest viewing is limited

AM Am Rio

J

jjmers

TAG Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2015
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
Service and/or Provider's Name:
Rio AM

Date of Encounter:
April 25 11am

Contact Method:
Email

Appointment Length & Costs:
2hr/ ¥35000

Type/Location:
Love Hotel

Language Notes:
English

Overall Rating:
1 out of 5

Details of the Encounter:
I choses Rio by the spec on the web site. It is obvious that they do not keep it up to date. When she walked up and introduced herself I should've walked away because I could tell that she was nothing close to 36-24-37 more like 38-36-41. Got to the hotel and I really knew I was screw when she undressed. Looked like she just had a bbc a baby. Talking about a complete turn off. Unless you like fat saggy women, say away from Rio.

I emailed AM and they said they were sorry that I was unhappy with the service and offered me a discount the next time I want to waste ¥40000( escort/hotel). If they was sorry they would keep their web site updated

Final Thoughts:
Not Recommended.

Closing Comments:
BIG waste of money and time.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the update.............. and sorry about your loss......
 
Really sorry about your experience. :(

Hope your next adventure is more appealing and pleasurable.

The only point that I will make here is that you have to take the website pics and measurements with a grain of salt... More often than not, those will be out dated and incorrect.
Some sites never update or copy and paste some random measurements just for the sake of baiting someone (or just being lazy, I don't know..).

Check reviews where possible... otherwise taking one for the team is appreciated where you may have saved someone else a lot of trouble later.
 
TAG Manager said:
Really sorry about your experience. :(

Hope your next adventure is more appealing and pleasurable.

The only point that I will make here is that you have to take the website pics and measurements with a grain of salt... More often than not, those will be out dated and incorrect.
Some sites never update or copy and paste some random measurements just for the sake of baiting someone (or just being lazy, I don't know..).

Check reviews where possible... otherwise taking one for the team is appreciated where you may have saved someone else a lot of trouble later.
Click to expand...
I did check this Website for reviews for the list of "ladies" AM had gave me and someone gave Rio 4/5 rating.
 
jjmers said:
I did check this Website for reviews for the list of "ladies" AM had gave me and someone gave Rio 4/5 rating.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry you had a bad experience - there's very little worse in the hobby than a giant let-down. The review that you refer to gave the experience with Rio a 4/5, although I wouldn't necessarily have assumed that was due to her appearance, especially when that review also said "People have said that she's not the youngest, slimmest, or prettiest AM girl and that may be true, but to me, she looked beautiful and similar enough to her pictures on the site."

There's also a number of other reviews of Rio that do a lot more than hint that Rio's draw as a provider has to do with 'maturity' than looks. See here, here, or here.
 
Meiji beat me....

I was reading the 4 of 5 review and the guy who posted that was quite new, anything for him may have seemed great...

We are of course sorry for your experience....

The topic of grouping reviews together has just come up and this looks like a good supporting case to have all reviews easier to find in one spot.
 
If I recall correctly, the first time I saw AM's website was shortly after the demise of PantherClaw (anyone?) at least 10 years ago.
And Rio was with AM then and I'm quite sure that any and all info about her hasn't changed in that whole time.

Joe
 
meiji said:
I'm sorry you had a bad experience - there's very little worse in the hobby than a giant let-down. The review that you refer to gave the experience with Rio a 4/5, although I wouldn't necessarily have assumed that was due to her appearance, especially when that review also said "People have said that she's not the youngest, slimmest, or prettiest AM girl and that may be true, but to me, she looked beautiful and similar enough to her pictures on the site."

There's also a number of other reviews of Rio that do a lot more than hint that Rio's draw as a provider has to do with 'maturity' than looks. See here, here, or here.
Click to expand...

Agree with meiji. Rio from AM has been around for a while now, and from the numerous reports I've read in the past eight (!) years it seems her reputation is based a lot more on service than appearance. She definitely has her fans & is popular with a certain niche though.

That said, although I check out the AM site from time to time I've never actually met anyone from there. Apart from their service obviously being aimed at tourists/foreigners, I'm not sure what they offer that justifies the price list.
Like other providers the stats should be taken as a very rough guide, especially the ages which can be off by a decade. And a lot of their ladies that have been around for a while don't update their pics much. I'm pretty sure Rio's are the same as they were 3-4 years ago.
 
Well, I used AsianMystique once and it went quite ok, and the lady did match with her profile.
So sometimes it's accurate and sometimes it's a 5-10 year difference.
What is the point of this profile roulette ?
 
DJV said:
So sometimes it's accurate and sometimes it's a 5-10 year difference.
What is the point of this profile roulette ?
Click to expand...

Its just the name of the game. Its not
like you can/would sue them for false advertising. Some of the lack in updated pics/specs is out of deference to the girl. After all, it hurts her feelings and her business to update that she's 5 years older and 5kg heavier.

If enough guys get sick of incorrect info, the provider and the org will take a hit in business. That's why writing and researching reviews is so important.

The main reason I haven't had a single bad experience with AM is because I almost never book a provider whose appearance or service in a review doesn't pass my criteria.

And to their credit, AM's info is somewhat accurate for most of their girls, their pictures are of
the actual girl, and for many of their
providers the pictures are updated over time.
 
I've seen Rio a few times over the years, so I knew what I was getting. Websites always put a positive spin on the girls' info, but this is a case where it is a little too far from reality (age 30??? Probably mid 40's). I think AM should describe Rio as MILF, experienced, a little soft around the corners, but provides great gfe. There are plenty of people looking for that.
 
To each his own. I have also seen Rio many times and actually she provides excellent service and is a wonderful company. Her looks are ok and definitely MILF but I'm not looking for a magazine cover model when P4P.. I'm looking more for great service and good company, and that my friend is what she is. Also she's very smart too. can tell you a thing or two about programming, life in Japan, .. conversant on most topics. Heck, after reading this and mentioning her name, I may just give AM a ring for Rio for that earth shattering BJ.. :)
 
pitty000 said:
To each his own. I have also seen Rio many times and actually she provides excellent service and is a wonderful company. Her looks are ok and definitely MILF but I'm not looking for a magazine cover model when P4P.. I'm looking more for great service and good company, and that my friend is what she is. Also she's very smart too. can tell you a thing or two about programming, life in Japan, .. conversant on most topics. Heck, after reading this and mentioning her name, I may just give AM a ring for Rio for that earth shattering BJ.. :)
Click to expand...
I like my women the average Japanese women size not something that is 20kg above 80% of most the women here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.