Guest viewing is limited

SB First Meeting

Penalty for unnecessary harshness as well as being partly untrue.

Nope, just proving that most people, including me, are morons!

You got a lot to learn for an old guy! Stochastic Topology is the true heart of erotic hedonism.

Seems nobody knows old dogs in the internet can't learn new topology? But I admit I was not being totally frank before, my real perversion is automata theory.
 
Nope, just proving that most people, including me, are morons!

In my previous response, I started to reply that only morons think everyone hates geometry, but I decided it was too harsh.

But I admit I was not being totally frank before, my real perversion is automata theory.

Whoa man...now you're talking!! Maybe we should book some lucky TAG lady for a mathematics-themed MFM 3p! Would that even be legal? To kinky even for Tokyo?

But seriously, do you have a fave CA (cellular automaton)?? Mine is the GLANT (Generalized Langton's Ant) going away...too cool for words.

I'd still say that my kink is sexier though; in fact, sex isn't possible in any meaningful way (for anyone) without employing an important example of a stochastic topological form.

-Ww
 
Last edited:
In my previous response, I started to reply that only morons think everyone hates geometry, but I decided it was too harsh.

That's just giving my claim more evidence by proving not everyone is a moron.

Would that even be legal?

According to Tokyo Metropolitan Police, on July 16, Taro Yamada, the 70-year-old manager of a kind of call girl service referred to in Japan as “math health” dispatched a 20-year-old woman to engage in discussion of universal four dimensional automata with two very old male clients in a hotel in Tokyo’s Taito Ward.

Yamada has been arrested for violating the Anti-Prostitution Laws. He has admitted to the allegations.

But seriously, do you have a fave CA (cellular automaton)?? Mine is the GLANT (Generalized Langton's Ant) going away...too cool for words.

I certainly do, wrote my thesis on one! Being a discrete gentleman not going to name any names, but I am more simple minded so it's already from 70's.
 
Nope, just proving that most people, including me, are morons!



Seems nobody knows old dogs in the internet can't learn new topology? But I admit I was not being totally frank before, my real perversion is automata theory.
You think it automata, but to me it doesn’t mata at all. HAHAHA!
 
That’s a big conspiracy theory. You sound like you’re easily swayed by stigmas against escorts. May I ask if she’s from an English speaking country? If that’s the case then it’s highly unlikely. If she’s such a good conversationalist who has been through school then she simply doesn’t need a mediator.[/QUOTE
Quite the contrary, you are the biased one. You just said that only people from English speaking countries can be educated enough not to have a pimp. If that isn’t a stereotype, I don’t know what is. To say that one with an overinflated mind, can’t have a pimp is ignorant. By the way she talks it suggests to me that she has a handler or somebody lurking behind the scenes. For all I know, it could be you.
 
I didn’t say the only way to work without “a pimp” is being from an English speaking country. I wasn’t born in an English speaking country either and good grief, I don’t have a pimp. If you’re a native or fluent English speaker, you can simply find your own clients without the help of a “mediator”. No need to share more than half of your earnings with a lower ranking organized crime group member. We are in Japan and women who are victims of pimps are unfortunately drug abusers or those who are not skilled at English or Japanese. The rest simply work as independents or for agencies. You’re just being overly paranoid..

I said, if she’s from an English speaking country then that’s highly unlikely.

You’ve said: “By the way she talks it suggests to me that she has a handler or somebody lurking behind the scenes. For all I know, it could be you.“

Me? A pimp?! Lol.
 
Last edited:
You think that English speaking people in transit can’t have a handler? I’m going to die laughing over that one. I’m going to drink some Cognac and sleep.
 
I'd still say that my kink is sexier though; in fact, sex isn't possible in any meaningful way (for anyone) without employing an important example of a stochastic topological form.

Please try not to miss your cues! One of you clowns is supposed to ask me what the hell I’m talking about in the above quote.

-Ww
 
I certainly do, wrote my thesis on one! Being a discrete gentleman not going to name any names, but I am more simple minded so it's already from 70's.

Perhaps we should start a new thread called "Are Cellular Automata always better kept a secret?" :D

-Ww
 
Please try not to miss your cues! One of you clowns is supposed to ask me what the hell I’m talking about in the above quote.

-Ww
Ok I’ll bite. I know your comment is tongue in cheek but it did occur to me that when some mokes use big words to try to sound educated and intellelctual they only manage to impress the people below their own level of brain power. This is because they are bright enough to have realized that some mokes and bimbos are impressed by big words (Wow! What does that mean?), but not intelligent and socially adept enough to know that the people who are smarter see straight through this. ‘This moke’s puttin on airs!’ a picaresque Dickens character might remark. Who’s he trying to impress? They are not quick enough too see how dumb they appear when they use big fancy words to sound intelligent. This particular kind of moke spends a lot of time on chat pages rather than in real life situations for obvious reasons.

Me? I have no fucking idea what a stochastic topology form is. It automata to me but it don't. Hahaha! But I do understand ‘the reality of experience’ and each day I go out ‘to forge in the smithy of my soul the uncreated conscience of my race.’ -Joyce. Chomp on that one this fine Sunday morning. Chin up and onward.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jackindabox
Ok I’ll bite. I know your comment is tongue in cheek but it did occur to me that when some mokes use big words to try to sound educated and intellectual

Not only is it tongue-in-cheek, it is also self-deprecating humor. Basically I am poking fun at myself (and @MikeH!) for being so absurdly geeky in this sub-thread of math posts. In a sense it is the opposite of trying to impress anyone. If this were an in-person conversation, my intent would be much more obvious from tone and body language etc. In a similar vein, I make fun of my age (I'm perhaps/probably the oldest monger on the board) in many of my TAG posts. In posts which lack all those in-person cues, I get that such things can easily be misunderstood and come across as arrogant or phony or whatever, but still many/most people get them...partly by assuming the best rather than the worst of the poster. Those here who actually know me almost certainly get what I'm trying to do. Indeed, the reference to stochastic topology is an indirect reference to a running joke (at my expense) among some of my friends and me (not that one needs to be in on the private joke to understand what I mean). I often get teased about this topic in a friendly way by some of those with whom I'm close.

That said, there actually is an amusingly obtuse connection of sorts between something which is a critical component of sex and an important stochastic topological form. An uber-geeky cocktail party factoid as it were.

Anyway, I am getting the feeling that my posts are bugging you quite often. If so, I invite you to consider putting me on "ignore"; I will then instantly disappear from TAG as far as you are concerned. You will also save yourself the time and effort you are putting into complaining about my personality, views, opinion of myself etc. Just an option to keep in mind.

each day I go out ‘to forge in the smithy of my soul the uncreated conscience of my race.’ -Joyce.

Nice quote!

-Ww
 
Ww, being older doesn’t give license to be a tiresome pedant, especially online. Ironically it now looks like you are claiming that in the real world maybe you don’t come off this way. All in the body language, is it? I may just take you up on your suggestion and put you on ignore. It’s summer. All the girls in their summer dresses are agitation enough. If this were pre-internet times and we were corresponding via snail mail, at this juncture, I would have mailed you a fart in a bottle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frenchy
The short story:

Took said SB to dinner again. The conversation once again was very stimulating for me. Same price was on the table but toward the time we were walking toward the station, she told me that I needed to pay the original price plus another 100K. Being a gambler, I headed for the ATM to pull out the extra cash. When I returned, she then said she was on her period and told me “not tonight”. She asked for half and we’d meet up next week and pay her the other half. I thought scam and told her I’d email her sometime this month. I was prepared. Most likely, I’m not her type. She could have just said that.
 
Last edited:
I’d love to know know the sin cosin and the tangent of Simonka’s ass. I would love to know the precise force of jiggle in those ass cheeks and whether or not you have twirking skills.
 
I know this is not a timely response.... but what the hell.... right ? :D You are "Assuming" that @Simonka has ass jiggle, but me thinks that's probably much less than one may guess, if you look at her photo's you see that she is rather firm and petite... granted no "First Hand" knowledge :(, but that's just my guess.... as for the sine/co-sine.... you would need her to provide data points for your calculations (by slide rule only plz) as to the force of the jiggle, Finite Element Analysis software could be used, but you would need sensors to determine the exact force... tri-axial data would be required for the X-Y-Z axis to determine precise force... I read a study where researchers were trying to determine the force shrimp create when moving their "legs".... and if it creates cavitation. but I digress..... I hope to read the paper you author on this topic.

As for your SB.... she wants money without the honey... when she says she on her period... just say.... SOooooo that you are cool with that. Use a towel.... call her bluff... I know my thinking about SB is a little slanted.... (I believe SB should also include sex) but there are loads of women/girls out there that do not have the same opinion as me on this topic. If this is the case then you need to be straight up with here... You pay her xxxxJPY/month or meeting and you expect (dinner, movie, talk, sex) If she says no to the sex, then you drop your allowance proportionately to what her company is worth to you. Of course she is going to overvalue herself.... I'm not saying all women do this, but from your description... she seems to believe that she is soooo amazing that you are lucky to pay her what she is asking... if she can get it then good on her, but don't let her dictate the terms...they should be negotiated to mutual agreement... SB is a business arrangement between 2 people. the other stuff that happens is between 2 consenting adults... If she says you are "cheap" because you want to negotiate the amount... tell her that she keeps changing the amount back to original, but original amount was based on sex. and since that has not happened (i'm assuming this) then the rate needs to be re-negotiated, otherwise you can always find a new SB.... That is unless you have told her how pretty she is and amazing she is and how lucky you are to spend time with her... blah blah bah.... then my friend you are stuck... time to move on to another SB IMO...

OK... so I know that my words may seem a bit harsh, but how long you work for the cash you are spending ? it has to equal some hours yes ? so have you reached your equilibrium on cash and satisfaction with this "almost SB" ? ? ? If not, then it's not worth the investment you have made... time to cash out and find a new SB to invest in... again just my opinion. and quite late at that....:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frenchy
I know this is not a timely response.... but what the hell.... right ? :D You are "Assuming" that @Simonka has ass jiggle, but me thinks that's probably much less than one may guess, if you look at her photo's you see that she is rather firm and petite... granted no "First Hand" knowledge :(, but that's just my guess.... as for the sine/co-sine.... you would need her to provide data points for your calculations (by slide rule only plz) as to the force of the jiggle, Finite Element Analysis software could be used, but you would need sensors to determine the exact force... tri-axial data would be required for the X-Y-Z axis to determine precise force... I read a study where researchers were trying to determine the force shrimp create when moving their "legs".... and if it creates cavitation. but I digress..... I hope to read the paper you author on this topic.

As for your SB.... she wants money without the honey... when she says she on her period... just say.... SOooooo that you are cool with that. Use a towel.... call her bluff... I know my thinking about SB is a little slanted.... (I believe SB should also include sex) but there are loads of women/girls out there that do not have the same opinion as me on this topic. If this is the case then you need to be straight up with here... You pay her xxxxJPY/month or meeting and you expect (dinner, movie, talk, sex) If she says no to the sex, then you drop your allowance proportionately to what her company is worth to you. Of course she is going to overvalue herself.... I'm not saying all women do this, but from your description... she seems to believe that she is soooo amazing that you are lucky to pay her what she is asking... if she can get it then good on her, but don't let her dictate the terms...they should be negotiated to mutual agreement... SB is a business arrangement between 2 people. the other stuff that happens is between 2 consenting adults... If she says you are "cheap" because you want to negotiate the amount... tell her that she keeps changing the amount back to original, but original amount was based on sex. and since that has not happened (i'm assuming this) then the rate needs to be re-negotiated, otherwise you can always find a new SB.... That is unless you have told her how pretty she is and amazing she is and how lucky you are to spend time with her... blah blah bah.... then my friend you are stuck... time to move on to another SB IMO...

OK... so I know that my words may seem a bit harsh, but how long you work for the cash you are spending ? it has to equal some hours yes ? so have you reached your equilibrium on cash and satisfaction with this "almost SB" ? ? ? If not, then it's not worth the investment you have made... time to cash out and find a new SB to invest in... again just my opinion. and quite late at that....:rolleyes:

This is something we should make clear from time to time , in a subtle (or even not so subtle) way: there are many other options. Of course they have other options too, but the guys ready to pay those sums on a recurring basis (I dont talk about splurging on a single date , say during a business trip) are few and far between, and the best SBs know how to hook them.