You probably believe that Obama was a Kenyan born implant because you can't hold his official birth certificate in your hands. Many Republicans believe he was born in Kenya to this day, regardless of how many times the MSM reports otherwise. So your 'skepticism' doesn't surprise me. I believe the Earth is round even though I have never seen it from space because I have to believe what others have written. I doubt there would any level of proof that would change your 'mind.'
Likewise, I'm sure no matter how much proof is put in front of you, Hillary would still be your saint and savior. No, I don't believe Obama is a Kenyan, nor do I think he's a Muslim. Thanks for bringing up that straw man.
I like to take the videos of Hillary lying, flip flopping more than the footwear of the same name, screwing over the Haitian people, public shaming of rape victims, and the whole host of other scandals under her name, spoken BY HER on camera. Hell, I'll take the first hand accounts of her former secret service agent who wrote a whole book about how fucked up she is. Funny thing, all of those are things from when she was the first lady, we're not even talking about her time as Secretary of State (okay, Haiti was while she was SoS)! But none of that means anything to you, I'm sure. Just like I'm sure you blame Bush for the economic crash in 2001-02. See, I can do straw man's too!
That's why discussing issues with you is a waste of time. Your mind is already made up and the only thing you can do is throw out straw man arguments and ad-hominem attacks. If you can show me one shred of evidence questioning the validity of the leaked e-mails, I'll be happy to discuss it with you. However, I've never seen anything even close to that. What I have seen are people trying to deflect, like CNN telling people on live TV that they can't read wikileaks, only the media is allowed to, or even the current trend of blaming thing on the Russians. No one has ever questioned or denied their validity. Hell, Hillary had a fantastic opportunity during the debates when specific content was brought up, and instead she tried to explain her comments. Remember her whole honest Abe analogy? That doesn't sound like a denial, hell, that's an admission of it's validity.
But hey, allow me to quote Obama from 4 years ago,
"The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because…the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”
Likewise, it's amazing that all of sudden, Russia is okay with Republicans! Sure, spy on us, meddle in our elections, invade other countries, indiscriminately bomb civilians! It's all good! If you take the Wikileaks information at face value, then you're a fool. The Russians are running an (dis)information campaign against the US, so without the ability to authenticate the emails, anything could have easily been altered (and certainly would have been if it suited the strategic goals of the Russians). Don't believe me? Watch the garbage news stories on RT (Russian Today) television, which is a propaganda arm of the Russian government. RT is the tip of the Russian information campaign.
I watch Daily Wire and Rubin Report, personally. See, I like them because they actually cite their sources, with things like pew research data and government statistics, and they're not extreme in either direction. Rubin is center left, DW is center right. They're not screaming matches, they're actual discussions. You know, like civilized adults. Hell of a lot better than the other garbage out there like The View, Fox, CNN, etc. I watched one episode of The View and it was just 4 shrieking banshees shouting down one guest. Sad because I used to like Whoopie, and they're usually wrong about what they're arguing about. I especially loved her comment about "No one uses an AR-15 for hunting!!!" yet if you look at the stats, the AR-15 is the most popular hunting rifle in the country. *face palm*
And yet, none of what you said here has anything to do with the validity of the information. I don't like Russia, I'm not okay with a lot of the things Putin does, but that doesn't mean I can't appreciate when they do something that exposes corruption in my own country's government. That's the whole point of wikileaks, exposing corruption around the world. Like exposing the torture and cruelty at Gitmo, which is what put them on the radar. Or Snowden exposing the NSA's spying on US citizens. I don't care where the information came from, as long as it's accurate. It's also painfully obvious that Russia only released the information in their own self interest. I don't know anyone who doesn't act in their own self interest. Yes, I'm sure Trump is better for Russia than Hillary. And? Does a stronger Russia hurt America? No, I think Obama has done more damage to America than Russia can.
IMO, the Russians have something on Trump. My guess, he's financed in part by Russian money. That's because he's a horrible businessman, and can't get regular financing like a successful businessman. He's relied on investment banking and who knows what else to finance his projects. Yes, we don't know, because his businesses are private corporations that aren't required to disclose information like a publicly traded corporation (he burned his investors and ran the only publicly traded company he was in charge of into the ground). Maybe if he dares to anger his Russian overlords they'll burn him by releasing embarrassing financial information. Time will tell.
Pure speculation with zero evidence on your end. And you call me a fool for believing in the leaked e-mails and speeches that Hillary and her campaign have never denied. C'mon man, at least be consistent.
