Guest viewing is limited

What's People's Issues With Pua?

Status
Not open for further replies.

static

TAG Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
360
Reaction score
703
Offshoot from the thread about the PUA arrested in Aichi, but a common theme here seems to be bashing PUA, bashing the prices of seminars, and I'm just curious where all the hate comes from? @Wwanderer is really the only one who expresses his views (and I think he's got valid points, but some misconceptions on what game is about), but others seem not only hostile, unwilling to have a discussion about what their beef is.

I wrote up a basic guide book on what PUA is about, not only to try and help new people, but to try and shed light on what PUA is without people having to pay for a seminar (I gave very general terms about what's covered on most boot camps, where they do go into a lot more detail). I put the same question one more to @Babaram as I did in the previous thread. Please, tell me what you object to. Let's have an actual discussion instead of posting threads bashing something out of ignorance. Otherwise, is turnabout fair play and I can post up threads about mongers bankrupting themselves, or raping escorts, the sex slave trade, testimonials from former escorts about the john's they've experienced?

Moreover, hopefully some of the issues can be addressed and even incorporated to future instructions to arrive at something everyone can be happy with. What we teach and support is organic and dynamic. We always are open to grow, and beyond that, help others grow to be better than we were yesterday.
 
I love a good pick up, but i think it's a bit creepy that men teach other men.
Kind of like teaming up against girls, trying to get them?
I'm generally envious on how men usually side together (except if someone steals the girl they really want) but women always seem to compete.
 
Well, I'll start off by saying that although I pick up girls, I don't think of myself as a PUA, for a variety of reasons which I believe are the same reasons people dislike pickup.

Before I even read anything about game and pick up I saw some videos of pick up artists doing obnoxious things, I heard news of guys like Julien Blanc getting banned from entering countries. It wasn't a good impression. Combined with what you hear about negging, and other questionable techniques, pickup seems like guys taking advantage of girls. There are still people who associate themselves with those traits, and I don't want to be attached to that label.

I'll share a personal story. A year ago I met a guy who had a great personality. People liked him, they were drawn to him. He didn't look good or dress well. But his social ability was so powerful, his charisma so great, that you couldn't help but enjoy yourself around him and want to know him better. I'm pretty sure we've all met someone like that at some point, but this guy was on a whole other level. I was really interested in how he was able to attract people like that.

After reading up a little, the part of pickup that I identify strongly with is self improvement, making yourself a more attractive person, not just to women but in the eyes of the world as well. Going to the gym, having a good hobby, dressing well. Of course, all this happens organically. You don't learn some magic tip or trick which makes people like you.

Combine that with a desire to get better at social interaction, and you have my idea of pickup. Not cheesy lines and strategies, just getting better as a person with a specific focus on interaction in a public context.

My end goal of pickup isn't to sleep with many girls, but to have a partner that I can have a fulfilling relationship with, emotionally and physically.
Now that I'm not currently studying, there isn't a setting for me to approach women other than in the street (I use this loosely to cover anything from the actual street to bars and cafes), and that requires a whole different set of skills.

So, pickup.

When people misunderstand what pickup is or PUAs choose to engage in aggressive or underhanded techniques that hurt others, it's easy to see where the dislike comes from.

I don't think posting angry or passive aggressive things (on either side) is the right way to approach such a sensitive topic. If there's some misunderstanding, you can try to clear it up without being too confrontational. If people don't answer questions (in the spirit of a fair and open discussion, almost anything should be fine, but often times it's not the case), it's because they are already turned off to discussion. Or they sense that you are not going to listen to their point of view anyway.

But I would very much like to hear what all of you have to say.
I feel like I read some threads about this before on TAG, but opinions do change and refine themselves over time.
 
A few to get you started:

1. I think everyone has the right to walk in public without someone invading their personal space, or touching them, or talking to them. This is one reason why people "bash" Nigerian touts, Chinese massage girls, sex worker recruiters or P.U.A. PUA that work public places expose themselves to this criticism.

2.I also think that while people like you are not interested in making money out of the PUA business - many are, and many are simply scammers. A while back there was some discussion on the site about an American PUA who visited Japan - the guy behind the White guy steals Chinese girlfriend video - that guy was clearly clueless on getting laid in Japan, but it didn't stop him charging guys around the world to access his website where he tells you all the secrets to getting laid in JPN -- the snake oil sales pitch and free steak knives type marketing.
 
Oh God, where to start...

Note, I have come to these opinions from having interacted with several PUAs and having been a member of a private PUA forum. I'm sure as human beings they are nice people but the stuff they spout is misguided at best and just plain harmful at worst.

1. I don't appreciate being approached when I am walking quickly/wearing headphones/in the middle of doing something. OK if you need help or directions but if you just want to make a stupid observation like "Are you playing a game on your iPad?" in an attempt to start a conversation, keep it to yourself.

2. There is a lot of junk science banded about. NLP is a classic example of this. PUAs spout the same nonsense/nonscience over and over and no one bothers to check the sources.

3. The whole object for many PUAs is to be able to pick up any woman for sex. Now someone is probably going to quote this and disagree but we all know that, for the majority, this is true. Of course, you might pick up women who want to have a one night stand, in which case, great. But there are many seedy PUA tactics out there designed to get women to sleep with you faster than they normally would be comfortable doing.

4. PUAs complain that women are childish and needy and need to be treated like dogs (some actually advocate using dog training manuals), yet their techniques are designed to target these types of women. No confident woman is going to fall for being neg'd.

5. A lot of PUAs try too hard with eye contact and touching and so come across as, well, weird. It's one thing to know how to counteract a dominate elbow touch in a handshake but when you are touching the bicep of everyone you meet it's gone too far.

(I'll add to this as I think of more).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love a good pick up, but i think it's a bit creepy that men teach other men.
Kind of like teaming up against girls, trying to get them?
I'm generally envious on how men usually side together (except if someone steals the girl they really want) but women always seem to compete.

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/confessions/advice/g2633/how-to-get-a-guy-to-like-you/

why is it creepy that men teach other men, but not the other way around?

my thoughts about why people dont like puas, specially women, is because women are used to looking for very specific cues when seeking for a man. Maybe what scares them is the possibility that some guys might be able to mimic those traits and that in the long run they would feel crossed up somehow. about men, i dunno, maybe because those who engage in the self improvement path are willing to take the risk, while those who just sit on their pseudo psychological podium are too afraid to stand up and try new horizons. and everybody knows that envy has many many subtle ways of sneaking in and expressing itself. briefly speaking, i think its along those lines
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sinapse
Thank you all for your responses, I'm gonna work on getting to em in a bit, but I definitely think you all made some wonderful points (with the exception of the one that didn't..)

I love a good pick up, but i think it's a bit creepy that men teach other men.
Kind of like teaming up against girls, trying to get them?
I'm generally envious on how men usually side together (except if someone steals the girl they really want) but women always seem to compete.
That is one of the cooler parts I think that I don't really see as a bad thing per se. Personally, I think it would be wonderful if there were a female PUA out there teaching men/women. IMO, in a perfect world, it shouldn't be this men vs women mentality. I think our goals as people in general should be to work together to make a relationship work with each other. However, as it stands society dictates that men are the ones that are supposed to make the moves, so as guys looking for a suitable partner, we have to do this massively inefficient method of talking to girls we're interested in and hoping one sticks

So far, this is the only one I've found

A few to get you started:

1. I think everyone has the right to walk in public without someone invading their personal space, or touching them, or talking to them. This is one reason why people "bash" Nigerian touts, Chinese massage girls, sex worker recruiters or P.U.A. PUA that work public places expose themselves to this criticism.

I completely agree with you here, though (and I know this is encroaching on redpill territory) I think most girls would be perfectly fine if it was someone like Tom Cruise, Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, Hugh Jackman, etc propositioning them. So as PUA's, it's about, what can we learn from men like this in order to get their success levels (which is where I think your average PUA differs from redpill guys). Do I need to hit the gym, diet, be more successful in my career, or is it some other x-factor we need? The communities I've been apart of have always advocated learning what we can from successful men to replicate it in ourselves.

However, I do have one question for you:
To people like the majority of foreigners who come to Japan, we have no social circle, work place relationships are discouraged (and often are specifically written in the contract as forbidden), etc. What other avenues are there to meet a partner? Second question: Even among PUA's in Japan, we kind of laugh at those guys that stand in front of the station, talking to every cute girl that comes out, yet if they weren't succeeding, do you think they'd keep doing it? Not to really assign blame per se, but the reason we have street pick ups, cat-calling, etc is because it yield's results (I'm engaged to a girl I met through street game).

I agree with you in that harassment shouldn't be the method employed, but at the same time persistence has and does continue to yield results to men. Where's the line that you draw?

2.I also think that while people like you are not interested in making money out of the PUA business - many are, and many are simply scammers. A while back there was some discussion on the site about an American PUA who visited Japan - the guy behind the White guy steals Chinese girlfriend video - that guy was clearly clueless on getting laid in Japan, but it didn't stop him charging guys around the world to access his website where he tells you all the secrets to getting laid in JPN -- the snake oil sales pitch and free steak knives type marketing.

I kind of find irony that in the same post you mention touts, massage girls, etc as annoying, but you condemn the entire PUA industry because of scammers. I agree, there are scammers and I think they're slimeballs. However, you have scammers in virtually any industry ranging from those car mechanics that screw people over who have no knowledge of cars, all the way to that bastard used car salesman who lies out his ass. For what it's worth, @Sinapse and @Dorian Gray are the real deal, having been a regular on their bootcamp(s). One way you know it is the post-bootcamp support, namely that you can attend any of their seminars for free in the future, and if you're out and about, they're usually willing to come out and game with you. From what I've seen, it's only them and RSD that offer that service (Shameless plug for those two =p)

And yea, those two guys from that video had terribad game (met them and did street with them for awhile). The Norwegian guy was kinda cool, just not calibrated for Japan. The American guy was a dick the whole night, though I suspect that's because he spent most of his time in Japan getting rejected.

On one other note about the whole taking money for lessons aspect. I spent around $2500 USD on my first bootcamp through RSD, and I don't regret spending a penny of that. Moreover, I think I took more away from that weekend BECAUSE I paid that much money. I'm dumping $2500 on something, I'm going to take it seriously and put 150% effort into it. I'm tired? Fuck that, let's do 50 more approaches. I am getting my money's worth!



Oh God, where to start...

Note, I have come to these opinions from having interacted with several PUAs and having been a member of a private PUA forum. I'm sure as human beings they are nice people but the stuff they spout is misguided at best and just plain harmful at worst.

1. I don't appreciate being approached when I am walking quickly/wearing headphones/in the middle of doing something. OK if you need help or directions but if you just want to make a stupid observation like "Are you playing a game on your iPad?" in an attempt to start a conversation, keep it to yourself.
Well, how would you like them to try and start a conversation with you? I agree that the whole "Excuse me, do you know where Starbucks is?" gets annoying. I'm sure you're an expert at every location of Starbucks in Tokyo by now.

I do agree (like I said above), that harassment shouldn't be a thing to good game, and if a girl is power walking with headphones in her ears obviously going somewhere, I'll typically ignore her (unless she's a 10 in my book :D). It'll usually be a fast "Hey, I can appreciate that you're in a hurry to go somewhere, let's exchange line and get to know each other when you're a little more free" type approach to the situation. I'm not in favor of screwing up a girls day, but at the same time, I know I'm a God walking amongst mere mortals, and I think a lot of girls would make time if their dream guy walked into their life. :)

2. There is a lot of junk science banded about. NLP is a classic example of this. PUAs spout the same nonsense/nonscience over and over and no one bothers to check the sources.
No argument, but at the same time, it's a growing science that gives us a common language to speak and exchange ideas, which I think NLP lingo does provide. I doubt most serious PUA's buy into the "If I master this NLP stuff, I can mind control any girl!" (of course, there are guys who prove me wrong *facepalm*)

3. The whole object for many PUAs is to be able to pick up any woman for sex. Now someone is probably going to quote this and disagree but we all know that, for the majority, this is true. Of course, you might pick up women who want to have a one night stand, in which case, great. But there are many seedy PUA tactics out there designed to get women to sleep with you faster than they normally would be comfortable doing.
Yes, I agree with you that many guys want to get sex. And like you said, many PUA's don't (I fell into the latter). Would you be willing to concede that PUA is a tool that gets used for a variety of uses, and it's the users of said tool that are bad, not the art itself?

I agree with you that seedy, deceptive "tools" shouldn't be used. I'm one of those guys that advocates for full honesty with girls, and if a girl starts thinking a relationship is going to happen (regardless of what I've said) and I'm not interested, I'll cut her off quickly rather than seeing how long I can milk it for. I do know guys who don't do that, and I have a low opinion of them. However, that's more on the guy rather than the tool. I think on this point we agree quite a bit, just arriving at different results.

4. PUAs complain that women are childish and needy and need to be treated like dogs (some actually advocate using dog training manuals), yet their techniques are designed to target these types of women. No confident woman is going to fall for being neg'd.
This too is 100% true. Humans are animals. We like to front like we're some amazingly advanced evolution of pure awesomeness, but at the end of the day, yes, we are animals. We learn behavior all our lives through positive and negative reinforcement. With my girl, I noticed that whenever I get her a dessert of some kind, I get amazing sex that night. She's just trained me in the same way we train a dog; encouraging favorable behavior with a positive reward, then discouraging unfavorable behavior with a consequence. Schools are exactly the same way. Study harder, get higher test scores and you get into higher level classes, get more praise from teachers, get more options available to you in life, etc.

Techniques IMO are often misunderstood. They are not the end goal for any PUA. When you think back to when guys are young and courting a woman, often times they give waaaaaaaaaay too many compliments. "Oh my god, you're so beautiful! Wow, you're so funny! etc etc etc" It comes off to (a lot) of girls as being waaaaay to smothery, clingy, etc. So for that guy, I would recommend he try negging, yes because he needs to learn how to see the bad parts of a girl and call her out on it. Eventually, he'll get to a nice, happy medium of treating a girl like he treats everyone else in his life: as a human being. Most of these "techniques" are more like exercises to help men find their natural style, not to be something used long term. Unfortunately, the above mentioned scammers and snake oil salesmen don't teach that aspect of it.

5. A lot of PUAs try too hard with eye contact and touching and so come across as, well, weird. It's one thing to know how to counteract a dominate elbow touch in a handshake but when you are touching the bicep of everyone you meet it's gone too far.

I agree here too, but like the above, it's a learning process. I can understand the objection that women are used en masse as a tool for learning good game, and I can agree with you that when a gamer gets to that point, he needs to stop and re-evaluate why he's in game. The guys who are serious about game usually do a pretty good job of not viewing women as a stepping stone. I've slept with a lot of women, and they all meant something to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AliceInWonderland
@deckard said everything I believe about game perfectly

Well, I'll start off by saying that although I pick up girls, I don't think of myself as a PUA, for a variety of reasons which I believe are the same reasons people dislike pickup.

Before I even read anything about game and pick up I saw some videos of pick up artists doing obnoxious things, I heard news of guys like Julien Blanc getting banned from entering countries. It wasn't a good impression. Combined with what you hear about negging, and other questionable techniques, pickup seems like guys taking advantage of girls. There are still people who associate themselves with those traits, and I don't want to be attached to that label.

I think this is the crux of it, people have a hard time separating the label from the teachings. Yes, the press coverage from Julien and those two douches from the stealing a girl video mentioned above are horrible. Those asswipes in redpill are just bitter, angry men, similar in many way to feminists. However, I wouldn't dream of painting all empowered women with the same brush as I paint feminists. Likewise, I wouldn't want to be painted the same as Julien.

I'll share a personal story. A year ago I met a guy who had a great personality. People liked him, they were drawn to him. He didn't look good or dress well. But his social ability was so powerful, his charisma so great, that you couldn't help but enjoy yourself around him and want to know him better. I'm pretty sure we've all met someone like that at some point, but this guy was on a whole other level. I was really interested in how he was able to attract people like that.

After reading up a little, the part of pickup that I identify strongly with is self improvement, making yourself a more attractive person, not just to women but in the eyes of the world as well. Going to the gym, having a good hobby, dressing well. Of course, all this happens organically. You don't learn some magic tip or trick which makes people like you.

Combine that with a desire to get better at social interaction, and you have my idea of pickup. Not cheesy lines and strategies, just getting better as a person with a specific focus on interaction in a public context.
This right here is what I think most of us consider game/nanpa/pick up to be. I'm really not sure how anyone can disagree with anything in here.

My end goal of pickup isn't to sleep with many girls, but to have a partner that I can have a fulfilling relationship with, emotionally and physically.
Now that I'm not currently studying, there isn't a setting for me to approach women other than in the street (I use this loosely to cover anything from the actual street to bars and cafes), and that requires a whole different set of skills.
*respect knuckles*

So, pickup.

When people misunderstand what pickup is or PUAs choose to engage in aggressive or underhanded techniques that hurt others, it's easy to see where the dislike comes from.

I don't think posting angry or passive aggressive things (on either side) is the right way to approach such a sensitive topic. If there's some misunderstanding, you can try to clear it up without being too confrontational. If people don't answer questions (in the spirit of a fair and open discussion, almost anything should be fine, but often times it's not the case), it's because they are already turned off to discussion. Or they sense that you are not going to listen to their point of view anyway.

But I would very much like to hear what all of you have to say.
I feel like I read some threads about this before on TAG, but opinions do change and refine themselves over time.

Exactly why I started this thread :)
 
Thank you all for your responses, I'm gonna work on getting to em in a bit, but I definitely think you all made some wonderful points (with the exception of the one that didn't..)


That is one of the cooler parts I think that I don't really see as a bad thing per se. Personally, I think it would be wonderful if there were a female PUA out there teaching men/women. IMO, in a perfect world, it shouldn't be this men vs women mentality. I think our goals as people in general should be to work together to make a relationship work with each other. However, as it stands society dictates that men are the ones that are supposed to make the moves, so as guys looking for a suitable partner, we have to do this massively inefficient method of talking to girls we're interested in and hoping one sticks

So far, this is the only one I've found



I completely agree with you here, though (and I know this is encroaching on redpill territory) I think most girls would be perfectly fine if it was someone like Tom Cruise, Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, Hugh Jackman, etc propositioning them. So as PUA's, it's about, what can we learn from men like this in order to get their success levels (which is where I think your average PUA differs from redpill guys). Do I need to hit the gym, diet, be more successful in my career, or is it some other x-factor we need? The communities I've been apart of have always advocated learning what we can from successful men to replicate it in ourselves.

However, I do have one question for you:
To people like the majority of foreigners who come to Japan, we have no social circle, work place relationships are discouraged (and often are specifically written in the contract as forbidden), etc. What other avenues are there to meet a partner? Second question: Even among PUA's in Japan, we kind of laugh at those guys that stand in front of the station, talking to every cute girl that comes out, yet if they weren't succeeding, do you think they'd keep doing it? Not to really assign blame per se, but the reason we have street pick ups, cat-calling, etc is because it yield's results (I'm engaged to a girl I met through street game).

I agree with you in that harassment shouldn't be the method employed, but at the same time persistence has and does continue to yield results to men. Where's the line that you draw?



I kind of find irony that in the same post you mention touts, massage girls, etc as annoying, but you condemn the entire PUA industry because of scammers. I agree, there are scammers and I think they're slimeballs. However, you have scammers in virtually any industry ranging from those car mechanics that screw people over who have no knowledge of cars, all the way to that bastard used car salesman who lies out his ass. For what it's worth, @Sinapse and @Dorian Gray are the real deal, having been a regular on their bootcamp(s). One way you know it is the post-bootcamp support, namely that you can attend any of their seminars for free in the future, and if you're out and about, they're usually willing to come out and game with you. From what I've seen, it's only them and RSD that offer that service (Shameless plug for those two =p)

And yea, those two guys from that video had terribad game (met them and did street with them for awhile). The Norwegian guy was kinda cool, just not calibrated for Japan. The American guy was a dick the whole night, though I suspect that's because he spent most of his time in Japan getting rejected.




Well, how would you like them to try and start a conversation with you? I agree that the whole "Excuse me, do you know where Starbucks is?" gets annoying. I'm sure you're an expert at every location of Starbucks in Tokyo by now.

I do agree (like I said above), that harassment shouldn't be a thing to good game, and if a girl is power walking with headphones in her ears obviously going somewhere, I'll typically ignore her (unless she's a 10 in my book :D). It'll usually be a fast "Hey, I can appreciate that you're in a hurry to go somewhere, let's exchange line and get to know each other when you're a little more free" type approach to the situation. I'm not in favor of screwing up a girls day, but at the same time, I know I'm a God walking amongst mere mortals, and I think a lot of girls would make time if their dream guy walked into their life. :)


No argument, but at the same time, it's a growing science that gives us a common language to speak and exchange ideas, which I think NLP lingo does provide. I doubt most serious PUA's buy into the "If I master this NLP stuff, I can mind control any girl!" (of course, there are guys who prove me wrong *facepalm*)


Yes, I agree with you that many guys want to get sex. And like you said, many PUA's don't (I fell into the latter). Would you be willing to concede that PUA is a tool that gets used for a variety of uses, and it's the users of said tool that are bad, not the art itself?

I agree with you that seedy, deceptive "tools" shouldn't be used. I'm one of those guys that advocates for full honesty with girls, and if a girl starts thinking a relationship is going to happen (regardless of what I've said) and I'm not interested, I'll cut her off quickly rather than seeing how long I can milk it for. I do know guys who don't do that, and I have a low opinion of them. However, that's more on the guy rather than the tool. I think on this point we agree quite a bit, just arriving at different results.


This too is 100% true. Humans are animals. We like to front like we're some amazingly advanced evolution of pure awesomeness, but at the end of the day, yes, we are animals. We learn behavior all our lives through positive and negative reinforcement. With my girl, I noticed that whenever I get her a dessert of some kind, I get amazing sex that night. She's just trained me in the same way we train a dog; encouraging favorable behavior with a positive reward, then discouraging unfavorable behavior with a consequence. Schools are exactly the same way. Study harder, get higher test scores and you get into higher level classes, get more praise from teachers, get more options available to you in life, etc.

Techniques IMO are often misunderstood. They are not the end goal for any PUA. When you think back to when guys are young and courting a woman, often times they give waaaaaaaaaay too many compliments. "Oh my god, you're so beautiful! Wow, you're so funny! etc etc etc" It comes off to (a lot) of girls as being waaaaay to smothery, clingy, etc. So for that guy, I would recommend he try negging, yes because he needs to learn how to see the bad parts of a girl and call her out on it. Eventually, he'll get to a nice, happy medium of treating a girl like he treats everyone else in his life: as a human being. Most of these "techniques" are more like exercises to help men find their natural style, not to be something used long term. Unfortunately, the above mentioned scammers and snake oil salesmen don't teach that aspect of it.



I agree here too, but like the above, it's a learning process. I can understand the objection that women are used en masse as a tool for learning good game, and I can agree with you that when a gamer gets to that point, he needs to stop and re-evaluate why he's in game. The guys who are serious about game usually do a pretty good job of not viewing women as a stepping stone. I've slept with a lot of women, and they all meant something to me.

@deckard said everything I believe about game perfectly



I think this is the crux of it, people have a hard time separating the label from the teachings. Yes, the press coverage from Julien and those two douches from the stealing a girl video mentioned above are horrible. Those asswipes in redpill are just bitter, angry men, similar in many way to feminists. However, I wouldn't dream of painting all empowered women with the same brush as I paint feminists. Likewise, I wouldn't want to be painted the same as Julien.


This right here is what I think most of us consider game/nanpa/pick up to be. I'm really not sure how anyone can disagree with anything in here.


*respect knuckles*



Exactly why I started this thread :)

As per the above example, what's wrong with PUA is that it promotes the need for an answer/reply/action to everything.
Not saying that it's wrong to push things a bit, but sometimes it's better to leave things as they are and just enjoy the view.
 
blah, blah, blah something pua, blah,blah, harassment is bad but "If I do it, she's a 10 so it's ok", blah, blah

Now I get how pick-up works....
You drown girls in a meaningless ocean of words.

No wonder it works so well, I got so bored of reading you , that midpost I already wanted you to fuck me if thats what it takes to make you stop.
 
As per the above example, what's wrong with PUA is that it promotes the need for an answer/reply/action to everything.
Not saying that it's wrong to push things a bit, but sometimes it's better to leave things as they are and just enjoy the view.

Perhaps in the traditional sense, that would be true. But I feel like pickup is about recognising and making the best of situations. So, if it's better to leave someone alone, a good student of pickup should understand that and leave that person alone.

I strongly believe in being flexible and playing things by ear.

I've definitely felt like people wanted to be alone and respected that wish.
 
Now I get how pick-up works....
You drown girls in a meaningless ocean of words.

No wonder it works so well, I got so bored of reading you , that midpost I already wanted you to fuck me if thats what it takes to make you stop.
If you have no desire to read and engage with other people's opinions, why visit a forum? Fuck, some people are beyond understanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sinapse
Cheap tricks...

How about taking a stab at an actual answer?

Is that beyond you?
 
beneath and thats when it became beyond...
thing is that it always comes across as talking and talking until the other one is convinced... the more you say youre just doing it to inprove yourself and to find the one true woman (but are perfectly fine with what it takes, of course), the less i believe you... what i do believe is that you have something to improve, when you tell everybody what youre doing and why are you are doing it...
and that is about general pua (no problem with people picking up people)...

about pua in japan: apparently everybody is so knowledgeable, but why do they still not understand where it is okay to flirt and where not! not understanding is okay, pretending isnt...
 
I really don't have anything to prove to anyone, I'm just curious why there's so much hate and want to engage in actual meaningful discussion. Point of discussion is like, actually talking (or typing in this case).

However, if the general consensus is that PUA is just this disgusting animal and people are so close-minded that they can't have civil, adult discussion about it despite speaking from a place of ignorance, I'd say that speaks more about certain individuals more than anything else.


As per the above example, what's wrong with PUA is that it promotes the need for an answer/reply/action to everything.
Not saying that it's wrong to push things a bit, but sometimes it's better to leave things as they are and just enjoy the view.

Now I get how pick-up works....
You drown girls in a meaningless ocean of words.

No wonder it works so well, I got so bored of reading you , that midpost I already wanted you to fuck me if thats what it takes to make you stop.
Case in point.
 
no ones talking about you...
i also dont think that pua are viewed as an disgusting animal, i dont even think anyone has a problem with pick up, but i guess pua are viewed as annoying douches...
might be because you only see the real bad examples, might be that they all got something on common (didnt someone call it something with pea cock?)...
might be because everybody is jealous and secretly wants to master the art of picking up...
 
There is a legit celebrity in the music industry (Grammy awards, fanatic/obsessed fans, groupies etc) who happens to be an actual/real friend of mine (or was, haven't seen or heard much from him in years...but we'd still be tight if we were to get in touch again). He once said the following to me (pretty close to an exact quote):

"Some people approach me and say something only because they recognize me and want to meet me. Other people do it only if there is something they need to tell me or ask me. I learned early to stay away from the first type because they mostly only care about themselves, not about me."

See the parallel?

I also know a couple who are both attorneys and who feel offended and hurt because so many people disdain attorneys, make jokes about them, look down upon them etc. My friends feel that they practice law in an honest, scrupulous, fair, responsible way that contributes positively to society and the people they deal with professionally. As far as I can see; they are correct. They do not fit many/any of the pervasive negative stereotypes about lawyers, but they do not deny that many other attorneys do follow those stereotypes to various degrees. Imo, it is completely unrealistic for my friends to expect people to change their general opinion of attorneys because personally they are exceptions.

See this parallel?

-Ww
 
However, if the general consensus is that PUA is just this disgusting animal and people are so close-minded that they can't have civil, adult discussion about it despite speaking from a place of ignorance, I'd say that speaks more about certain individuals more than anything else.

Close minded? Ignorant? It couldn't just be that everyone against PUA in this thread has perhaps independently reached the conclusion that PUAs are a pain in the neck?
 
no ones talking about you...

Oi,

I do.

That guy over there just said its ok to harass a girl if she is hot enough.
What? was he joking?
Partially....probably, and that still worries me.

If you ask me, Lex Talionis, and we ask his opinion again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anna Summer
To people like the majority of foreigners who come to Japan, we have no social circle, work place relationships are discouraged (and often are specifically written in the contract as forbidden), etc. What other avenues are there to meet a partner?

I think the reality here is certain people expect such men to blow all their money on prostitutes and never have meaningful relationships. They are so set in that lifestyle that they don't realize or they can't stand for guys to think differently.

To such, if a guy can get sex for free, it's like saying they are failures. So PUA can make them uncomfortable. The point is we aren't all the same, and each man or woman has their own way in which they want to enjoy their short existence.

And there are others that don't understand or don't care about problems men have, because such women can very easily get attention, sex, or money from men. Her perspective is coming from such abundance (while fit, young, or still have looks), that she doesn't understand scarcity or difficulty (yet).

Second question: Even among PUA's in Japan, we kind of laugh at those guys that stand in front of the station, talking to every cute girl that comes out, yet if they weren't succeeding, do you think they'd keep doing it?

A lot of guys by the train station exits are pros. They are more about hustling for money, not dating. They are hosts, porn and prostitute recruiters, con-artists, Izakaya/restaurant flier pushers, salesmen, etc...

And a problem is that many women and foreigners that don't know what's up, confuse those type of professionals and street hustlers with nampa and PUA. Some do know the difference, but appear to prefer conflating them together, because they think that's going to limit the choices of other men to only buying women. And it doesn't. Men and women are more often than not going to choose what works for them, not what someone else wants.
 
@static - One reason that PUA/gamers who feel that the negative stereotypes associated with those labels don't apply to them personally rarely get much sympathy, especially on this board, is that mongers/punters/johns are FAR more negatively stereotyped by society and the population at large. Here is the most convenient/closest/recent example:

I think the reality here is certain people expect such men to blow all their money on prostitutes and never have meaningful relationships. They are so set in that lifestyle that they don't realize or they can't stand for guys to think differently.

To such, if a guy can get sex for free, it's like saying they are failures. ...

But in fact the above is a fairly mild view, many/most people (women especially but many men too) view us as disgusting, perverted, immoral creepy low-life with no-character, no success in attracting women on our own (a theory particularly popular with TAG PUAs whose screen names start with an S) and who view the women we employ exclusively as sex objects...as losers and jerks basically.

Now many of us, very much including me, feel that this stereotype does not fit us personally at all. Fortunately (imo), many of us, most certainly including me, have a different way (than you and other local PUAs) of dealing with being so misunderstood and unfairly despised. Namely, we don't care.

And of course and obviously, if you want to talk about groups who are truly unfairly stereotyped negatively and stigmatized beyond all reason and humanity, there are sex workers...

-Ww
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.