User#18046
TAG Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2017
- Messages
- 562
- Reaction score
- 2,012
Because this concept of "out of my league" is a generalization, but humans are different and every situation is unique, then the argument could be made that the concept of out of my league does not really exist in the real world. But the generalization is there because certain large categories of women are, statistically speaking, unavailable to me in spite of the outliers who may have different attitudes from their peers. The more options a person has, the more picky they can be. So a woman who has hundreds of men interested in her can look for a guy that meets all her criteria in whatever order: looks, money, personality, religious preference, etc. Women who fall into that category could be generally assumed to be out of the league of a man who has only one or two of those attributes, though he may stand a chance with a statistically insignificant number of that group's population who prioritize his strengths over his shortcomings.
In addition to the first runner up miss USA that I dated back in the 1980s, I have dated a rather surprising number of women that I would ordinarily consider to be out of my league. Certainly my friends considered them out of my league. For the reasons I put in my first post of this thread, those relationships were not ultimately successful. So in the end, they were out of my league even if I was able to overcome initial hurdles and date them for a short time.
In addition to the first runner up miss USA that I dated back in the 1980s, I have dated a rather surprising number of women that I would ordinarily consider to be out of my league. Certainly my friends considered them out of my league. For the reasons I put in my first post of this thread, those relationships were not ultimately successful. So in the end, they were out of my league even if I was able to overcome initial hurdles and date them for a short time.