TheScientist
TAG Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2014
- Messages
- 3,922
- Reaction score
- 7,154
Might as well be The People's DailyYou mean TV Chou-nichi? What? They might be biased?
Might as well be The People's DailyYou mean TV Chou-nichi? What? They might be biased?
Well, in a way it was also true with his predecessor. Including living in Trump's head (all his tweeting about him, paying detectives to prove he was not born in the U.S etc... the guy was clearly obsessed by Obama)Whats most funny to me is how Trump lives in people's heads rent free.
"A New York Times report on Trump’s remarks said it “was more typical of North Korean propagandists than it was of past American presidents.” Even Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) expressed displeasure at the remarks, saying, “all it’s going to do is bring us closer to some kind of serious confrontation.”
But back in 1993, President Bill Clinton gave perhaps an even starker warning to North Korea. In a trip to Seoul, South Korea, Clinton said that if North Korea gained and used a nuclear weapon “we would quickly and overwhelmingly retaliate.”
“It would mean the end of their country as they know it,” he said, according to a New York Times report at that time."
The only difference is Trump using Twitter.
The only difference is Trump using Twitter.
He's been an extremely ineffective and incompetent president. I think if he solves the North Korean crisis somehow he'll save whatever legacy he has, but I doubt we'll see it come to resolve peacefully. Hoping that everyone in Japan stays safe, because if there's a war I know Seoul will be dust, not sure what would come of Japan though.
Do you have any statistics/comparisons between his ineffectiveness and previous presidents?
Thats a popular opinion with some people but in actuality its purely speculative.a grave threat to world peace.
During his administration the US increased drone strikes by several hundred percent including killing a US citizen w/o court approval, Russia upped it proxy war in the Ukraine and annexed Crimea and the Syrian civil war intensified
and he got a Nobel Peace prize!But it's OK because he looked so good on TV!
Hmmmm it's like everybody forgot the global financial crisis he inherited... and also Bin Laden was still alive at that time, if I remember well.and he got a Nobel Peace prize!
the 2008 crash was unrelated to the level of war. I'm glad he authorized the mission on Bin Ladin and increased drone strikes but was just pointing out that despite all the hype around POTUS Trump and potential war, people ignore the recent past so easily.Hmmmm it's like everybody forgot the global financial crisis he inherited... and also Bin Laden was still alive at that time, if I remember well.
I'm not puppy fan of Obama , but frankly he could have done much worse given the cards he was handled at the beginning.
I could sound very biased (considering where I'm originally from), but I see this to be more of a failure of American government. It was possible to establish more or less balanced relationship back in 1991, but unfortunately that opportunity was not exercised.Russia upped it proxy war in the Ukraine and annexed Crimea and the Syrian civil war intensified
Don't know where you are from but I do personally remember several attempts to rebalance the US/RU relationship at and since 91. I'm also aware of multiple major shifts domestically in RU which make it impossible to lay the blame on the US's doorstep.I could sound very biased (considering where I'm originally from), but I see this to be more of a failure of American government. It was possible to establish more or less balanced relationship back in 1991, but unfortunately that opportunity was not exercised.
None of them worked though and expansion of NATO along with forced independence of Kosovo didn't help either.several attempts to rebalance the US/RU relationship at and since 91
None of them worked though and expansion of NATO along with forced independence of Kosovo didn't help either.
That being said, if Trump would be able to keep US/RU relationship at acceptable not leading to war level this would already be an achievement.
If RU would stop being so worried about the "near abroad"/FSU/former colonies and focus on actual domestic matters, that would help a lot more. But thats not going to happen, it would be a completely ahistorical event for RU.
but from a historical and geopolitical perspective, none of this is surprising.
a re-unified Germany, which Russia hasn't had great relationships with for a long long time,
Given this it's really no surprise at all they aren't just 'focusing on actual domestic matters',
There's lots of people out there that look at Russia or China or even countries like Iran and attribute evil or even irrational intentions because they don't understand the history and geopolitical environment in which they are making the decisions they make.
Thanks for the explanation. I don't know who is doing the dividing. But the sharply divided media sources seem to be driving us apart. I can't talk with my conservative acquaintances any more - we see two completely different sets of facts for any issue.
I can see something as both evil and rational
Also needs to be said that what is moral is not the same in different cultures.No doubt - the most evil people in history have operated on a very rational basis. Rationality has little to do with morality.