Sorry who disagrees with what? Your post makes no sense.
Also 'if a British exit leads to restriction on EU migrants'... Well there is a big question mark hanging over that point isn't there? In spite of the leave campaign's claims that bre it would reduce the numbers of EU migrants it seems pretty clear that the EU will only allow Britain free trade if it accepts free movement. And the leave campaign knew that and yet still campaigned on the basis of reduced immigration. Like the leave campaigners your logic is all over the place and your grasp on the facts is (willfully or not) rather loose.
There are of course pros and cons on both sides of the argument but I don't think they received a fair hearing during the referendum.
Every region in England voted Out except London. I guess your 'real' people are in London. Widen your circle of associates and listen to different viewpoints.
And worst, like MossBoss in his previous comments about the insults received by the Japanese wife of Blackmage, to make derogatory comments to those victims of those racial slurs...
Nough said...
I am amazed by the amount of press quotes you use in your posts... Just thought you lectured us recently that one should not believe in what the press says.. I must have missed something, stupid as I am.....
.
@Curacao mention of ftse 250 bad performance is very appropriate.
Ftse 100 has many of companies reporting their income in USD, including oil / gas and mining companies. Their good performances in GBP are hiding the counter performance of local businesses.
The fact that ftse250 is down around 5%, when ftse100 is up, is emphasizing how bad is the performance of these local companies as I would say 70% of the capitalization of the ftse250 is the ftse100.
Another point to mention (as it is true it's not all about economics) is that UK is losing a lot of political power by leaving EU. US just lost its best way to influence European affairs add its closest ally won't have any voting right at the commission.
Also after leaving EC, UK will have to find a deal with the EC to access the single market. It could end up at best to basically applying European rules without voting right, which is the current situation with Iceland and Norway...
Basically, it would mean almost the same situation as before but after losing its voice in the process.
And the Turkey thing is a joke. Nobody believes it. Even Johnson stopped using it.
To become an EC member, a country need to be accepted by every single member of the community, i.e they all have a veto right... And believe me, there will be many vetos despite the pressure of the US (and formerly UK) to push for the adhesion of this close (ambiguous) NATO ally.
I'm happy for brexit, I consider any step to move power closer to individual favorable.
Bringing it down from unelected bureaucrates to country level stupid politician is a step in the right direction.
I also want to add that the media wants to brainwash people into thinking only racist and old people voted for it.
The reality is that people just reject brussel unelected bureaucrates, and burdensome bureaucracy, they are fed up with bullshits. It has nothing to do with immigration.
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25...ailure-of-western-establishment-institutions/
Very good article indeed.I also want to add that the media wants to brainwash people into thinking only racist and old people voted for it.
The reality is that people just reject brussel unelected bureaucrates, and burdensome bureaucracy, they are fed up with bullshits. It has nothing to do with immigration.
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25...ailure-of-western-establishment-institutions/
Very good article indeed.
I am quoting:
The Los Angeles Times’s Vincent Bevins, in an outstanding and concise analysis, wrote that “both Brexit and Trumpism are the very, very wrong answers to legitimate questions that urban elites have refused to ask for 30 years”;
I cannot agree more.
People are pissed off by the lack of empathy of their elite. Their choices are just terribly wrong and they will be the first one hurt.
However, they don't have a problem that in their own country, laws passed by an elected body (The Parliament) can be ( and have recently been ) blocked by an unelected body.. (The House of Lords..)
As the saying goes, just clean your own house before judging others...
To continue with the 'European project' would eventually mean they wouldn't have a country left.
So true!And why would that be a problem? Countries need citizens to survive, but the citizens do not need a country.
Also I'd rather be controlled by British politicians and Lords than a bunch of random freeloaders from Europe.
You really want to be "controlled" by those "British politicians"? Not me, sorry.
I am sure you will agree with me on this one!!!
So true!
I always considered myself as a citizen of the world, and not from a petty small or (not so small) country....
European politicians are the same, except with farther reaching power.Very honestly, when you watch Boris Johnson disappearing like a ghost the morning after, Gove betraying him in a way more sinister than "house of Cards" could ever imagined, the Labour party leadership tearing themselves apart... You really want to be "controlled" by those "British politicians"? Not me, sorry.
I am sure you will agree with me on this one!!!