DJV
TAG Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 499
- Reaction score
- 843
ok, this topic is quite intense, I just can't totally agree with everyone and I wasn't exactly sure why.
Here's my thoughts (not to impose them, just saying it's personal and honest)
First, on asking a provider if she is cis/trans upfront, this is just silly to me because since a vast majority of women are cis, this is just what people expect. No judgement here, just basic statistical expectations/assumptions, like her height is between 150cm and 180cm, she has a pair of eyes, she is not android, etc.
About the P4P context : as I see it, it's a game, so some fairytales and fantasies are allowed. Does the provider only cares about money ? Maybe, but she won't say upfront and it's ok. Does she enjoy the event ? It appears so..
Does the guy has to apologize for his flaws and limitations ? No, he shows (or tries to show) some persona and can stick to it.
So for me, anything that can enrich the experience (both true or false) is ok and even encouraged.
I know that some people don't like abstract and intellectual things, so even in a P4P context they might need truth, facts, past records, etc. These people (I don't know why I have the word "cops" coming in mind) are plenty, so we might all agree on something on this topic, only to find that 90%+ of the wold population thinks otherwise. Not saying that we are wrong here, just that we can't ignore the thinking system of the majority.
To make things more complex, your own behaviour can be simultaneously a mix of "I want fantasy" and "I want a real experience", so...
About Ww's list of features, we talked about trans, and vegetarians, and yes there are conflicting zones between prejudices, personal preferences, education etc.
Like, for complex and/or obscure reasons, I have an opinion on each item on the list, and whether a certain "feature" would make my sex experience better or not, even the ones that I haven't intimately encountered yet. Not even talking about combinations : I would really like to have sex with a drug-addict trekie onanist vegetarian, please. (role-play accepted)
When it comes to trans, I remember I was once very intolerant with them, but I figured out after a long deconstruction process that it was truly a mix of inconfort, ignorance and religious judgemental education.
Reason and experience can help on exposing lies and prejudices, but I think discomfort, like fear, can be irrational or with multiple causes, and even nowadays I would be a little weird out by finding out (afterwards or not) that I slept with a trans.
Good news is I can enjoy unexpected situations and outcomes more than I fear them, so maybe I should just try or put myself in positions when it's likely to happen to put a final touch to the process !
Here's my thoughts (not to impose them, just saying it's personal and honest)
First, on asking a provider if she is cis/trans upfront, this is just silly to me because since a vast majority of women are cis, this is just what people expect. No judgement here, just basic statistical expectations/assumptions, like her height is between 150cm and 180cm, she has a pair of eyes, she is not android, etc.
About the P4P context : as I see it, it's a game, so some fairytales and fantasies are allowed. Does the provider only cares about money ? Maybe, but she won't say upfront and it's ok. Does she enjoy the event ? It appears so..
Does the guy has to apologize for his flaws and limitations ? No, he shows (or tries to show) some persona and can stick to it.
So for me, anything that can enrich the experience (both true or false) is ok and even encouraged.
I know that some people don't like abstract and intellectual things, so even in a P4P context they might need truth, facts, past records, etc. These people (I don't know why I have the word "cops" coming in mind) are plenty, so we might all agree on something on this topic, only to find that 90%+ of the wold population thinks otherwise. Not saying that we are wrong here, just that we can't ignore the thinking system of the majority.
To make things more complex, your own behaviour can be simultaneously a mix of "I want fantasy" and "I want a real experience", so...
About Ww's list of features, we talked about trans, and vegetarians, and yes there are conflicting zones between prejudices, personal preferences, education etc.
Like, for complex and/or obscure reasons, I have an opinion on each item on the list, and whether a certain "feature" would make my sex experience better or not, even the ones that I haven't intimately encountered yet. Not even talking about combinations : I would really like to have sex with a drug-addict trekie onanist vegetarian, please. (role-play accepted)
When it comes to trans, I remember I was once very intolerant with them, but I figured out after a long deconstruction process that it was truly a mix of inconfort, ignorance and religious judgemental education.
Reason and experience can help on exposing lies and prejudices, but I think discomfort, like fear, can be irrational or with multiple causes, and even nowadays I would be a little weird out by finding out (afterwards or not) that I slept with a trans.
Good news is I can enjoy unexpected situations and outcomes more than I fear them, so maybe I should just try or put myself in positions when it's likely to happen to put a final touch to the process !