TheDutchElm
TAG Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Messages
- 200
- Reaction score
- 162
I'm reminded of that line in "Bullworth": "Everyone should fuck everyone else until we're all brown."
Not exactly, there will always be differences in color among humans. It comes with the geographical different places we live and genetics. The human race will never be just one color.I'm reminded of that line in "Bullworth": "Everyone should fuck everyone else until we're all brown."
I am just saying it's not necessary to use such an adjective. And I have read many of your posts. But I'd rather not see pejoratives used by anyone. We are good Keiji.Definetly not. You got me wrong and that is only because you haven't read enough of my posts. I have made clear difference when I use the words "nigger" and when I speak of black people. I choose to use the word Nigger only when they are the subject of White American's attack, so as to remind Americans of how much Racism is there.
Whenever I talk about black people in normal circunstances, I don't employ Nigger. Plus...with all the posts I have made already it should be GLASS CLEAR that I am much into favoring black people in supportive defense.
Just read more of my posts, I forgive you in advanced.
There are 2 elements to that in which a lot of foreigners don't know and I've seen over the years in Japan:Don't have time to read the thread but just wanted to add in a little story
Was seeing a JK Style girl and asked her why Gajin were okay, and she told me that she told the staff that she would not see "Dark Skinned People" Including Indians because they seem like they have disease etc. Kept talking to her and it was obvious she was racist against non-asian / whites...
I don't even know how Style staff would check for this because they don't ask about race, but boy did it turn me off from a GFE to have a girl spout out blanket racist phrases...
Some <people> will say whatever they THINK <other people> want to hear.1) Some Japanese will say whatever they THINK Whites want to hear.
Some <people> force, export and spread racist ideology in <their new country>Some Whites force, export, and spread racist ideology in Japan.
Some <people> will say whatever they THINK <other people> want to hear.
Some <people> force, export and spread racist ideology in <their new country>
I agree with most of your posts but you appear to be quoting these as though it's a Japanese thing, it's done all over the world by everyone.
Two more little replies that I have left out:
You don't need me for saying this any non white american can say it too. That Toshiba comercial is nothing compared to American Hollywood movies. You can have the most brigthest "LAW" you want which penalizes films that do not include minorities. But the reality for the rest of the World is that: The Nigger always die first" rule. And we are not talking about some underground C class category independent label. We are talking about Hollywood. You show to the rest of the World the White Shit all the time. And don't even think of talking about the new Fantastic Four which has a black guy when there's non in the comics for Johny Human Torch. Which is 1 movie out of thousands where the Nigger dies first is shoved to the face of all of us in the big screen. I get it, in some stories it would be ilogical to have a minority. So because a Nigger is shown in American movies for 5 minutes that doesn't lift or clear the fact that Americans are NOT racist. Quarter Racism, a third Racism, Half Racism its all still Racism. And you came to me with 1 commercial...versus 95% of Hollywood movies. I will believe your "LAWS" are effective when I watch enough movies where the Nigger gets to live the whole film. Until then your "LAWS" are nothing to me.
Now... I will reply the second small half to the other message.
A black childhood friend of mine in America once told me his mother told him always to be on time because if you're late, "you don't want to be a black man running". I cannot see how dealing with that level of institutional racism even compares to the kind of mildly annoying reverse racism GD is talking about. Finer white whine I have never partaken of. I'm with Louis CK on this one: if I could choose my race every year, I'd re-up on white every damn time.
I agree with @meiji that the real discriminated gaijin are the non-white foreigners. It's a caste system with the whites on top and the Filipinos and blacks (non-North American) somewhere near the bottom. When this subject comes up, I often tell friends Japan is a great place as a white person to experience racism...in the same way you can understand rape and pillage by riding the Pirates of the Caribbean ride at Disney: yeah, you'll see pirates, but unless you really put a foot amiss, you're not going to REALLY suffer. Micro-aggressions are annoying (I do internally roll my eyes when people ask if I can use hashi), but that kind of ignorant racism really only seems to have a lasting effect on people who insist on trying to fully integrate. The foreigner's cultural job in Japan is to be foreign. The father you try to depart from that, the faster the grit of rejection will grind you down.
Sigh, I really didn't want to do this, but let's not let our bias cloud our logic. In an interracial and multi-ethic society, there will be crimes and incidents from all kinds of different groups.You're right; it's just a " white whine."
http://chicksontheright.com/blog/it...k-man-on-st-louis-metro-definitely-not-racism
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/201...woman-kills-12-y-o-white-boy-with-blow-torch/
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/0...n-community-sees-hammer-murder-as-hate-crime/
http://fox59.com/2015/03/15/woman-caught-on-video-beating-another-woman-and-a-child/
Yeah. They are all whiners.
Not anecdotes. General reality in many U.S. Cities.Nice anecdotes bro.
Ignorant nonsense. Plain and simple. If you truly understood history, you'd know that there only 4,743 lynchings IN TOTAL between 1882- and 1968- only 3, 446 of those were black. The majority of the remainder where white southerners. Most victims, black as well as white, were alleged perpetrators of crimes. This doesn't mean it's "ok" to lynch people- what it means is that southern culture possessed an element of mob justice and blacks were disproportionately affected. "Lynching," as a knee jerk emotional justifier for ruining neighborhoods and schools to shooting a Hispanic 18-month old in the face, simply didn't exist in that way. Furthermore, if you have to go back 30, 40, 50 years your argument futile by default. We are talking about modern reality here, and in modern reality interracial violence is largely a black on white phenomenon. The numbers bear this out in state after state.Sigh, I really didn't want to do this, but let's not let our bias cloud our logic. In an interracial and multi-ethic society, there will be crimes and incidents from all kinds of different groups.
The point is the law, justice, and fairness. Does the law apply equally to all groups, irregardless of who did what to whom?
Furthermore, socioeconomics is a huge factor in crime, so let us not pretend it doesn't exist.
And any White Americans pointing the finger as if they are a persecuted group in America is laughable. The historical injustices perpetrated against people of color isn't something to laugh about or casually dismiss.
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2015/02...-the-Spectacular-Lynchings-of-Black-Americans
Perhaps the focus, if we are comparing Japan to other countries, is fair treatment and laws.
Fox News, chicksontheright...why not link to InfoWars while you're at it? Cherrypicking those anecdotes (and that's what they are) is not an indication of institutional racism against whites. Given the course of American history, the very notion is laughable.