PUA has no position of power to use to get women into compromising positions. P4P use $$$/power to get girls. Cosby used his position in the industry to get industry girls.
For the most part, you are correct, Cosby preyed on "industry girls." However, in the article cited, the woman merely had the misfortune of attending the same university.
Hey, I don't especially blame PUA folks for their tactics and I don't condemn P4P folks for their purchasing power.
My litmus test, as written in another thread, in any relationship is this:
Has she has grown measurably in a positive direction during the relationship/become a "better" person?
Have I grown measurably in a positive direction during the relationship/become a "better" person?
Now, admittedly, in many PUA and P4P situations, the relationship is brief. So, additionally, I might add,
Do both parties treat each other with honesty, integrity, and basic human respect? Is every attempt made to do no harm to each other?
Let's face it, humans, especially men, thrive on sex and will use any means necessary to achieve that goal.
A horny guy is apt to resort to tactics that primarily center on his own satisfaction. Yet, sex is, or should be, a mutually satisfying experience-one of equality rather than dominance, at least in a civilized society.
So, I don't condemn neither PUA nor P4P as long as every consideration is given to the values previously stated.
Of course, for me, this is all, for the most part, academic. I prefer the satisfaction and piece of mind I have in marriage. It's not for everyone, but works well for me.
Here's wishing that all will find the kind of relationships that benefit all the participants, whatever shape or form it takes.
One Love!