It was his wife's requirement.
Got it. In That case unless he's showing symptoms or fakes them he's not gonna get it under insurance coverage anywhere save for the free anonymous testing places unless someone has other info
It was his wife's requirement.
Actually never noticed that... good tip.Quite a few clinics indicate on the websites that stating the fact that you had unprotected sex would suffice to get the tests covered by the insurance.
are there more comprehensive tests?
Just curious, but would people say that the majority of providers(who are not vaccinated) that have worked longer than a year have HPV? I've been reading up on it and it seems like it's really easy to get and in many cases there are no symptoms.
You are more probably have it than them though. What I have read spreads very easily to guys and the current estimates are that 75% of males have had it at some point of time.
HPV is a virus, and if you have it, then it’s generally in your system forever; like HSV-2 aka genital Herpes.
Mycoplasma and ureaplasma as well, though it may only be worthwhile testing for those if you are showing symptoms of a UTI and test negative for both gonorhhea and chlamydia.Beyond that, you can get tested for herpes, hep a/b/c, trich at almost any clinic, you just have to ask.
As long as I’ve been here I think I can count with one hand the people in this forum that have ever reported gotten infected with anything. I might be wrong, but it’s quite rare.
I feel so special right now.
So when I explain my mongering to my coworkers, they try to get on my ass about I spend money for pussy as they call it. I give them a couple of points.
The sad part is that I am more worried about STIs with non-SWs than I am with SWs.
lol, I suggested getting a hiv test because there was fs included. Regardless of whether it’s with or without condom we should get tested for hiv.
Disclaimer:I'm not a doctor this i just my opinion.
No, you are not a doctor. You’re not even ducking medical would be my guess based on your assessment. And sticking a disclaimer of ‘basically’ and added failure scenarios doesn’t give you that 100% number either. You didn’t even do a cursory search online on the efficacy of condom use in HIV protection/transmission, otherwise you wouldn't have spouted the 100% nonsense. Or you didn’t understand it and still spouted that 100% safe shit.Disclaimer:I'm not a doctor this i just my opinion.
That's not really a true a condom is "BASICALLY" 100 percent safe, unless you removed the condom or a hole or something you should be safe.
[QUOTE="MikeH, post: 243775, member: 11599"
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/l...condoms-100-effective-at-preventing-pregnancy
It’s great that you want to do everything you can to protect yourself from pregnancy before you’re ready. So here’s the deal on condoms: when used correctly, they’re really effective (about 98%) at preventing both pregnancy and STDs— but they don’t completely eliminate the risk. That’s because there is no 100% effective method of pregnancy prevention besides abstinence (not having sex at all).
Well I have to explain a little more so you can understand why they say 98-99% in America Lysol disinfectant Company was sued after saying it kills 100% of germs which was beyond possible to prove. So legally no one is allowed to say it's 100 percent use a condom properly and pull out to avoid over flow of semen you'll be good. In reality a condom is 100 percent prevent a std "In my opinion" basically saying don't follow this idea because technically no. But touching a human doesn't give you a hiv either how the liquid get through a platic wrap?..... Improper use